Building of a manned copter with a gasoline engine.

[Ihor Nastashchuk]

"...misrepresentation/ignorance you are displaying..."

I advise you to refrain from rudeness, but first learn to read carefully!

1. It is evident in the figures and in the photo that the pilot sits above the plane of rotation of the propellers.
2. I already answered this question - propellers with a high load on the area are NOT autorotated!
3. I already answered and this question. For VERY DARK AND LAZY - I repeat - will be the same as with a helicopter, which broke the reducer!
Only in difference from the helicopter (I repeatedly REPEAT) - I have a system of parachute rescue.
Yes, instead of changing the cyclic pitch on one propeller, like a helicopter, I applied a change in the overall pitch on the four propellers.
Why is this ignorance?

"...If you're lucky, you'll attract only half the lawsuits that Moller did..."

With my luck, I'll figure it out myself, without such advisers!

"...if they lose power, airplanes can glide under control and helicopters can autorotate..."

You're right. But only partially.

The helicopter will be autorotated if the engine has decayed and the propeller does not get stuck. If it sticks - no autorotation.
If the blade breaks - the same - there will be no autorotation - the helicopter will fall.

The plane will only plan if the engine has decayed. In the event of a breakdown of something else - a wing, a stabilizer, or even a flap or aileron - the airplane is likely to fall.

That is - the ability to plan or autorotate - depends on what a breakdown.

But it does not bother anyone - everyone flies.

So with my project. It depends on what will break.

100% guarantee can be given in this life only one - WE ALL DIE, sooner or later. All the rest is just a probability!
A parachute is a way to reduce this probability!

Besides - why should it break?
Look at it.





In comparison with these propellers, mine are just a coffee grinder!
But on helicopters this heap has been flying for decades!