I just want to step in for a second and comment on this on a personal level. I am the president of the Employee Flying Club at EAA, which helps pilots on staff stay current and welcomes new staff members to the joys of flying with an in-house support system that allows them to pursue those dreams. While we have a sizeable number of pilots on staff at EAA, in the past few years that we have been active our club has licensed about half a dozen new pilots and soloed several more. Glory, the moderator of this forum, is a very enthusiastic member of our current crop of students. Even many of the staffers who choose not to earn their license participate in flying club events and discover more about our great EAA community.
While I came to EAA as a pilot, I had never built an airplane before. Thanks to our staff build project – a Zenith 750 STOL – I am now intimately familiar with aircraft electrical systems, as I built most of ours. I also got my tailwheel endorsement through our club. There is always room to grow and develop in this community, and if we are going to survive we must welcome all comers who share our passion.
I agree that an organization of pilots, builders, and enthusiasts must have the same interests at its very heart, and be closely connected to the community. But I take exception to the accusation that staff members who do not fly or were not hired as pilots are “out of touch.” We’re making pilots here, and some of our newest pilots are now the most active members of our club – I’m not sure what encompasses grassroots aviation more than that.