Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Electric Motors for Aircraft

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    robert l's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Heath Springs, S.C.
    Posts
    590
    Personaly, I like the sound of the engine up front, once you get atuned to it, you can hit almost any RPM just by the sound. I've never cared for gliders either, even though there is a glider field less than 15 miles from my house. When I'm flying, I don't want to have to depend on thermals and wind currents to stay aloft, heck, I may change my intended flight plan just because.
    Bob

  2. #2
    rwanttaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,951
    Quote Originally Posted by robert l View Post
    Personaly, I like the sound of the engine up front, once you get atuned to it, you can hit almost any RPM just by the sound.
    Anyone who has flown electric RC airplanes can tell you: It may sound different, but the noise varies significantly by motor speed. One could set the RPM by ear.

    The elephant in the electric-airplane closet is 14 CFR 91.151, Fuel Requirements for VFR Flight.

    (a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed -

    (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes;
    (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.


    I'm sure this'll require a re-interpretation by the FAA, since battery power isn't a binary situation (e.g., having gas vs. not having gas). If I were to have absolute control over the regulatory process ("What, AGAIN?") I'd word this to require that the aircraft have enough juice to maintain altitude for 30 minutes after arriving at the first point of intended landing.

    Most electric-airplane articles I see mention about a 30-minute duration; in these cases, the plane shouldn't even be taking off. Even if your battery has a 1-hour life, you're still expected to land after 30 minutes to comply with 91.151.

    Ron Wanttaja

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    282
    Just do it. The FAA will not move until they are forced to do so. Newton knew that years ago. "An object at rest will continue to stay at rest until a force is acted upon it." You're best off to start with something that is already up and operating and adapt it to your installation.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,205
    I have talked to several experimenters that buy a wrecked "Zero" motorcycle and use all of the electric system.
    There was an article in Kitplanes a few months ago, I think a motorglider fitted with a "Zero" electric system.

  5. #5
    rwanttaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,951
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Berson View Post
    I have talked to several experimenters that buy a wrecked "Zero" motorcycle and use all of the electric system.
    There was an article in Kitplanes a few months ago, I think a motorglider fitted with a "Zero" electric system.
    Only trouble is, they keep flying into aircraft carriers. :-)

    Ron Wanttaja

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by rwanttaja View Post
    Only trouble is, they keep flying into aircraft carriers. :-)

    Ron Wanttaja
    Different Zero, Ron, different Zero!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fort Vermilion Alberta
    Posts
    196
    Dale Kramer of Lazair fame has a kit for that aircraft. I believe there is another one, Thundergull? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eYIfGGk2yg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •