For what its worth, you might want to read:
http://www.aero-news.net/ANNTicker.c...9-a3aa1685685d

Its a bit long, but its written to fill an on online column. The author reviews many comments made in this thread, but most important of all he speculates, because he has no actual documentation, regarding events that may have occurred. Speculation is risky because it may or may not be true, and if untrue, breeds rumors. (That's why EAA should come clean on this. If there have not been any molestations, then say so ! If there have, then EAA just needs to day "Yes, but we're not giving out details to protect the minor(s) involved.")

The author also states "I have been advised and confirmed documentation that has provided some basic warnings from headquarters of the impending need for this, for a number of months via online/written communications that were sent to those involved in these programs."

Q: What's a basic warning?

Q: Sent to those involved? Define that. Our YE coordinator throws away nothing. Ever. He reads everything. Asked him if had received anything prior to January 15th, and he said that he had not.