I agree, but I usually always pick a scenario that gives opens the door to discuss related items to review with supplemental information. If I just stuck to scenario topic material there may be little to discuss. But the better ones have lots things to discuss on what led to the pilots predicament and that comes back to the ADM exercised before they got into trouble. It always takes quite a bit of preparation work to build up a scenario IMO.

What I really miss though is that Radek always used to be able to provide the "rest of the story". Sometimes you don't really care what option the pilot may have chosen but often it would be really nice to know what what have cause the issue or what the pilot actually did.


Paul Kortopates
Master CFI-I, A&P/IA