Printable View
This one in spectacular fashion as shown in 2 spectacular videos. Amazing no one killed on Michigan lake 3 days ago. How many does this make now, I've lost track? i'm sure this will be self-explanatory to y'all.
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/227679
Wow, that didn't look good from the very beginning! Glad there were no fatalities!
Noticed Icon wasn't at AV19 for the first time in quite a few years.
The pilot of the most recent accident had an ATP, and word is that he was a regional sales representative for Icon. Other stories say he was flying a prospective buyer of his own aircraft. I believe the pilot's ATP was relatively recent (in the past two years).
There are about 100 Icons in the registry, and there have been, I believe, five accidents. I don't believe any of the accidents point to any failing of the aircraft. One deliberate maneuvering at low altitude, one flying up a box canyon, one fuel exhaustion, one hard landing (on the water), and, IIRC, one case of landing on the water with the gear down. Amphibious aircraft have higher accident rates than land-only airplanes, and at least two of the five cases are directly related to operations off the water.
I certainly am one among many who decries Icon's marketing approach, but don't believe there's any evidence of a flaw in the design.
Ron Wanttaja
Agreed: don't believe any of the accidents point to any failing of the airplane.Quote:
Originally Posted by rwanttaja
Agreed: don't believe there's any evidence of a flaw in the design.
Agreed: the obscene marketing strategy tied to the liaissez-faire attitude about flying and safety that is the cause for these crashes.
Clearly this crash is pilot error, neglect of proper on the water flying boat procedures and horrible decision making. I've got lots of seaplane experience and I've never ever seen a "U Turn" water take off. Yahoo jet ski attitude and little type flying experience meets flying boat is a recipe for disaster but that's all on Icon's negligent and offensively irresponsible marketing strategy for the past 11 years. This is the precise reason why they made customers who still wanted the airplane sign off on the liability waiver as well as accept the on board Flight Data Recorder contained in the revised one-sided sales agreement. THEY KNEW! THEY KNEW! Classic example of wanting your cake and eating it too.
If you check the registry, you will notice that of those 100 or so Icons, 30-35 are registered to Icon Ltd.
Icon did not exhibit this year at their usual big tent space of the past 11 years. But they did have a presence at the GoPro exhibit with an airplane and 2 reps(they were both Canadian so we got sympatico).
Sorry, Floats I was apparently unclear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Floatsflyer
I don't like Icon's "Flying Jet Ski" marketing, but I think it's waaaay too early to claim it contributes to the accident rate.
One of the five Icon accidents is hot-dogging, but the Halliday case involved a pilot with over 600 hours of time in other types of aircraft. I would have expected he knew the issues. Witnesses agree he was "yanking and banking" at low altitude, but according to one witness, the accident didn't involve FJS (Flying Jet Ski) sort of flying. "A witness to the accident stated, during an interview with a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator, that he saw the airplane perform a climb to between 300 and 500 ft on a southerly heading and then turn and descend on an easterly heading about a 45° nose-down attitude. He then saw the airplane impact the water and nose over. "
Obviously, could be a belated pull-up. But the accident itself didn't occur during the low-level "FJS" maneuvering.
In any case, a total of five accidents is not statistically significant.
There may be readers who own calculators, and thus may claim, "20% of Icon accidents are due to FJS operations!"
Mathematically true. However, based the first five RV-8 accidents, we could claim, "20% of RV-8 accidents are due to wing failures!" or "20% of RV-8 accidents involve inflight fires!" Mathematically true...if we consider only the first five accidents. Things got a lot better with time.
Amphibian aircraft always have a higher accident rate than conventional aircraft. There's a reason the Searey has about the same accident rate as Lancairs.
We can play Cassandra all we want, but the fact is, understanding the causes of aviation accidents owes more to hindsight than foresight. I don't like Icon's marketing approach, but the jury's still out about whether it's going to affect the safety rate.
Ron Wanttaja
I'm afraid that by the time the jury re-enters the courtroom, two things will have occurred: Either Icon will close the doors and go out of business or the insurance industry will refuse to cover them.Quote:
Originally Posted by rwanttaja
Reminds me of a (probably apocryphal) quote from Mao Tse Tung. They asked Mao what he thought of the French Revolution.Quote:
Originally Posted by Floatsflyer
His answer:
"Too soon to tell."
Ron "Inscrutable" Wanttaja
Good one! I'd prefer to quote something more current like when the present occupant of the WH goes to his most favorite, most used highly intelligent phrase, "We'll see what happens."Quote:
Originally Posted by rwanttaja
From the looks of that impact, I suspect the Icon has an excellent restraint system considering both occupants survived that crash.
If you watch closely, you can see the plane is just at the beginning of a stall when he hits that tree. Too slow airspeed for that steep of bank. Not sure how big that lake is, but I would think he had better take off options than to launch that close to shore and then turn as he was climbing.
Icon is apparently hurting....
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ts-production/
"Stung by the trade war with China that’s dried up investment capital, light sport manufacturer Icon said Friday that it’s reducing its workforce by 40 percent and cutting production to fewer than five airplanes a month. COO Thomas Wieners said in a conference call Friday afternoon that the workforce will decline from 650 workers to about 400. "
Floats better buy one while they're still available. :-)
Ron Wanttaja
Never! For $400K+, I can get 2 great 185's on amphibs or a damn good Beaver on straight floats. And besides, in a few short years they'll be selling on Barnstormers for 10 cents on the dollar( or not, because that onerous, odious sales contract stipulates owners can only sell them back to Icon; but if they're out of business...)Quote:
Originally Posted by rwanttaja
Now you know why the 1800 deposits on the order book dwindled to only 100 or so. Only a few depositors with sh*t for brains and large investment portfolios would accept the one-sided T's & C's of that absurd contract.
Uh-huh. That's as convenient a thing as any to blame, I guess. I mean, if it weren't for that they'd have to figure out how to blame climate change or deforestation or something. Trade war is much more "this week".Quote:
Originally Posted by rwanttaja
Floats, dude, you need to stop internalizing. Let it out, tell us how you really feel. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Floatsflyer
LOL Dale. My therapist tells me it's good for my overall mental and emotional health and well being to always call out the aviation snake oil salesmen. Looking at my left shoulder and swiping, "GET OFF!"Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleB
Icon had at least 3 rounds with VC's but I have no idea if they were China based.