PDA

View Full Version : UPDATED: Human Birdwings first flight ... or was it?



Hal Bryan
01-20-2012, 02:30 PM
I've followed this project for a while, and was pretty interested when I heard about the video. Unfortunately, though, it may not be legit. I have my opinion, but what do you guys think? Real or CGI?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=Q0tKFOcHyrI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=Q0tKFOcHyrI

Chris In Marshfield
01-20-2012, 03:35 PM
Boy, I dunno... Seems borderline... Tough call...

Dana
01-20-2012, 06:19 PM
If he's running into a wind, he just might get enough airspeed to "hop" for a moment, as one can do when kiting a paraglider in a moderate breeze (and there does seem to be wind noise in the microphone)... but no way is the wing flapping doing anything at all.

Zack Baughman
01-20-2012, 06:34 PM
Looks fake to me.

steveinindy
01-20-2012, 06:38 PM
Looks fake to me.

My thoughts exactly.

Floatsflyer
01-20-2012, 06:40 PM
For me, there's no hoax being perpetrated because they didn't do anything to warrant a "wow factor." There is no flying being done whatsoever. That nano second lift is a hop by the runner in a lame attempt to try and get airborne. The non-skeptical, logical, intuitive part of my brain says that a human being, no matter how well conditioned, with the most technologicaly advanced bird-like wings cannot run fast enough, cannot flap their arms fast enough or long enough to sustain anything resembling flight from a ground take-off. Let's discuss.

rosiejerryrosie
01-21-2012, 09:21 AM
It would take a genetically engineered human with hollow bones (like birds) to be light enough to fly with birdlike wings. They have the wings - now they need to concentrate on developing a human with the correct characteristics to pull this off. Oh... and the wings will have to be modified to 'warp' like bird flight feathers.....

Todd copeland
01-21-2012, 03:17 PM
Fake

1684zach
01-22-2012, 10:49 AM
Very fake looking!

Jim Hann
01-22-2012, 11:52 AM
I'm thinking fake also.

Dana
01-22-2012, 08:24 PM
It's not fake, it's just... no big deal. Nothing more than anybody could do running with a hang glider or paraglider. I've done it myself with a paraglider.

designman
01-26-2012, 06:45 PM
If anyone will take the time to carefully stop these frames at the point of the first sort of "bird hop" you will see the wings are flapping to rise about 10 feet above ground line at the base of the trees! Also notice the shadow cast onto the ground as the flyer lifts off the ground! Albeit this is but a short short series of hops - but don't forget the Wright Bros., had some very short hops as well!

Sid
01-27-2012, 02:19 PM
Fake.
Notice how the camera points to the ground just before the so called flight attempt, and then points to the ground again before they show him just after the so called flight attempt.
I believe this is so they don't have to transition from real video to fake and back to real video.

Hal Bryan
03-20-2012, 02:42 PM
Here's another video from Jarno the "flying" (?) Dutchman:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYW5G2kbrKk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYW5G2kbrKk

What do you think?

Dana
03-20-2012, 07:23 PM
The new video is clearly fake. It's obvious that the wing sails are not loaded, i.e. not producing lift. Furthermore there is no way it could be stable or controllable.

Floatsflyer
03-20-2012, 07:43 PM
I previously posted that no hoax was being perpetrated because there was no "wow" factor in the original video. This video is clearly a bird of a different colour with a "wow" factor that is so huge it's beyond comprehension and credibility.

Same conclusion as before: a human being, no matter how well conditioned, with the most technologicaly advanced bird-like wings cannot run fast enough, cannot flap their arms fast enough or long enough to sustain anything resembling flight from a ground take-off. Must applaud the pilot's acting skills though, he is very convincing playing out of breathe and exausted from the ordeal.

Hal Bryan
03-20-2012, 08:15 PM
Overall I agree, just one minor point (that admittedly doesn't really change anything) - the "pilot" isn't powering the wings himself. He's (allegedly) using a Bluetooth connection via a modified Wii remote to direct their motion as powered by electric motors. So strength isn't an issue, but that doesn't speak to any of the other problems.

Floatsflyer
03-20-2012, 08:33 PM
Overall I agree, just one minor point (that admittedly doesn't really change anything) - the "pilot" isn't powering the wings himself. He's (allegedly) using a Bluetooth connection via a modified Wii remote to direct their motion as powered by electric motors. So strength isn't an issue, but that doesn't speak to any of the other problems.


Hal, you have great powers of observation. I viewed the video again and still don't see any of the Bluetooth stuff. Where exactly is it in the timing?

Dana
03-21-2012, 04:12 AM
It doesn't show in the video... the stuff about the Wii and BT was in an earlier description. But either way, there's clearly nothing visible (batteries or motors) large enough to provide any meaningful amount of power.

It's part of the "almost plausible" bits... some guys actually are using Wii parts as the stability and control system of R/C quadcopters. But here, it's ridiculous.

Hal Bryan
03-21-2012, 07:00 AM
Hal, you have great powers of observation. I viewed the video again and still don't see any of the Bluetooth stuff. Where exactly is it in the timing?

It's true, my observational powers are spectacular, and I have evolved to the point where I can visually perceive waves of Bluetooth energy... ;)

Or, it's the fact that I've been curious enough about this guy's claims that I've spent a little time at his website, watched earlier videos, etc. Plus, you can see at about the 0:35 - 0:45 mark that there's no apparent physical connection between his arms and the wings.

It's interesting that this video is part 14 of 14... why would videos documenting an ongoing experiment have a planned ending number?

My hunch is that a sponsor will come forward and reveal that this is a viral ad campaign, and that a lot of pretty respectable sites / news sources are going to be pretty embarrassed.

Zack Baughman
03-21-2012, 07:17 AM
a lot of pretty respectable sites / news sources are going to be pretty embarrassed.

Gizmodo??? :rollseyes:

Zack Baughman
03-21-2012, 11:55 AM
Another update: http://gizmodo.com/5895235/cgi-experts-say-flying-bird-man-is-fake

Hal Bryan
03-21-2012, 01:59 PM
Something tells me we should be buying stock in Slingshot Sports... :)

Ozzie
03-21-2012, 06:00 PM
Da Vinci and Lawrence Hargrave http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/hargrave-lawrence-6563 http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/hargrave_bio_large_print.html must be having a bit of a laugh at this.

ozzie

Hal Bryan
03-22-2012, 05:08 PM
Well, he's finally come clean:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/birdman-admits-hoax/