Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: EFR rating: When VFR rating is not anough and IFR rating is too much.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike M View Post
    "where did the FAA make that preference known?" I infer that from the FAA restrictions on over the top flight for Pt135 ops. Might be wrong.
    Lots of additional restrictions for 135 ops, but that doesn't mean the FAA is against the alternative for non-commercial ops.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    FA40
    Posts
    767
    If the FAA was "against" VFR OTT for Pt91 pilots, I believe they'd issue a NPRM. If they "prefer" no VFR OTT they'd keep the restrictions on it for "for hire" ops and talk up the dangers when giving Pt 91
    training presentations.
    Last edited by Mike M; 05-28-2020 at 04:55 PM.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    Just to clarify, I originally said: "would prefer VFR only pilots not fly VFR OTT" We know it shouldn't substantially increase risk for an IR pilot.

    The FAA has restricted student pilots, recreational pilots and sport pilots from flying VFR OTT. That wasn't always the case for student pilots. The FAA slipped in a change when nobody was looking. Looks like they prefer student pilots not do that.

    The preference became known to me at a safety meeting several yrs ago when it was indicted by an FAA rep. while giving a presentation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •