Very good. That's the argument I needed to hear, and I agree that the logic makes sense.
I find it a bit strange that the FAA would exempt Experimental aircraft from the day VFR 91.205 requirements, but whether a loophole or intentional, you've convinced me.
I certainly understand the desire for support, but isn't "it's not in a condition for safe operation", per the paragraph I quoted above, enough? Otherwise, why put that in there?