Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: your thoughts on " Box Wing In Ground"?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21

    your thoughts on " Box Wing In Ground"?


  2. #2
    EAA Staff / Moderator Hal Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States
    Posts
    1,296
    Unfortunately, YouTube has blocked that video (at least here in the U.S.) due to copyright violations. Is there another copy somewhere?

    Hal Bryan
    EAA Lifetime 638979
    Vintage 714005 | Warbirds 553527
    Managing Editor
    EAA—The Spirit of Aviation

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    Last edited by qxev; 11-07-2012 at 08:15 PM.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    I was thinking Norm is well underway on his second project. And third, and fourth.....

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    The main problem of easy planes is high breakdown rate on landing
    statistics of accidents of easy planes at the stage "calling-contact-run"



    The statistics of flight incidents in hydroaviation of Canada, shows that over 77 % of these incidents occur around a seadrome at performance of takes off and landing and maneuvering the Usual reasons – collisions with floating and underwater subjects and obstacles, the wrong assessment the pilot of a wind and waves of conditions and distances to water.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgHmT...layer_embedded

    but there are also other flying cars, much safer on landing

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwC8M...eature=related

    The FIRST Way of increase of safety on landing is the choice of the SCHEME providing the smallest landing speeds:

    The FIRST requirement for "the family plane"

    controllability on SMALL (landing) speed

    what does it mean PRACTICALLY?

    it means that at a design of the plane there should be "a wide plane" (a big wing) which creates BIG carrying power - at low horizontal speed


    Landing speed: 65 km/h
    Maximum 320 km/h
    Max. take-off weight: 600 kg
    Empty weight: 250 kg
    Engine: Rotax 912 S
    Fuel consumption: 15 l / h
    :78800 EURO
    ... the unusual configuration of Bateleur brings a number of advantages in comparison with usual the high-plan or a lowplane the winged aircraft....

    this configuration is very similar to wing-in-ground

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    In 1912 the plane of a design of T.Richards Prior to the beginning of the First World War the plane rose in air flew 128 h, the people who did not have experience of control of airplane could pilot it. It was noted that on it it was possible to increase safely an angle of attack to 30 °.... Thanks to a ring-shaped wing with small load of the area the plane was capable to pancake smoothly in default the engine or other malfunctions in flight. This remarkable feature saved life to several pilots testing it.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    Jack Jones (Jack M. Jones), the inventor of the concept of it such as the aircraft under the name Geobat and the designer of his two working models.
    The first the Popular Science magazine paid attention to Jones's works (April issue for 1997). This note drew attention of the Pentagon which sent with an inspection trip to a dzhonsovsky creative workshop in dense forests of Georgia of three engineers of the naval research laboratory (NRL)


    «three-segment circular wing» (3WCP — Three Wing Circular Planform), and in 2000 was included into number of 10 nominees of competition under the aegis of the Discovery magazine on the best technological innovation.
    What declared advantages of the scheme offered by Jones?
    First of all — significant carrying power at small weight of all design.
    Structural integrity of Geobat surpasses usual aviation schemes that increases durability, reduces level of vibrations, facilitates design and construction of such aircraft.
    Affirms that Geobat possesses fine maneuverability and controllability, is very steady in flight, is poorly appreciable on radar screens and easily adapts under "invisible being".
    quite solid Institute of a science and technology of Japanese prefecture of Nar (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) became interested in it.
    The institute obtained the license for Geobat and created group under the direction of William Riken (William D. Rieken) for research of prospects of technology...

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sidney, OH
    Posts
    444
    I know that these designs work and maybe more efficient, but they just don't look "right". Maybe they'll "take-off" commercially, if the economy picks-up and we get some younger guys interested in this airframe design.

    Joe

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe LaMantia View Post
    I know that these designs work and maybe more efficient, but they just don't look "right". Maybe they'll "take-off" commercially, if the economy picks-up and we get some younger guys interested in this airframe design.

    Joe
    we want to collect some principles for one flying car. as it is done by Bert Rutan

    Bored in retirement, legendary aerospace engineer Burt Rutan is working on a new project, a high-speed winged boat that can double as a seaplane, so he can fly between lakes and rivers near his new home in Coeur d'Alene, a lakeside resort in northern Idaho.
    http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/on...e-retirem.html

    But when Burt Rutan says "seaplane", you know he's not thinking of the propeller-powered pontoon planes that have been flown for decades. Instead, his plans draw inspiration from large wing Russian ships or "ekranoplans" built during the Cold War (see below).


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •