Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 157

Thread: Hightower Resigns as EAA President/CEO

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    mikeno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Lee's Summit, MO
    Posts
    23
    In my humble opinion Rod Hightower's priority was not with experimental aircraft or homebuilders or any of the things that made EAA the strongest aviation community in the world. The first indicator was a piece he wrote early in February 2012 and said if you hadn't flown formation or aerobatics you were not an aviator, only a pilot (this is not a personal attack Hal, read the article). That statement in and of itself probably excluded 75% of the membership from his elite club of "aviators". I knew when I read that article that Mr. Hightower was better suited to a tailored flightsuit with nary a single spot of oil or grease or mustard that us plain old pilots have.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    24
    Perhaps those of us who would applaud other departures from the organization and Sport Aviation in particular will have their hopes realized....

  3. #3
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeno View Post
    In my humble opinion Rod Hightower's priority was not with experimental aircraft or homebuilders or any of the things that made EAA the strongest aviation community in the world. The first indicator was a piece he wrote early in February 2012 and said if you hadn't flown formation or aerobatics you were not an aviator, only a pilot (this is not a personal attack Hal, read the article). That statement in and of itself probably excluded 75% of the membership from his elite club of "aviators". I knew when I read that article that Mr. Hightower was better suited to a tailored flightsuit with nary a single spot of oil or grease or mustard that us plain old pilots have.
    So the simple act of not having an experimental plane or building one should exclude us from the EAA then, is what I'm reading between the lines. That's the number one reason I feel like EAA is trying to alienate a big portion of people, and a reason I'll have to strongly think about before renewing this winter.
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    966
    Quote Originally Posted by kscessnadriver View Post
    So the simple act of not having an experimental plane or building one should exclude us from the EAA then, is what I'm reading between the lines. That's the number one reason I feel like EAA is trying to alienate a big portion of people, and a reason I'll have to strongly think about before renewing this winter.
    EAA was moving away from its core mission. That didn't go over well with the people who joined EAA because of its uniqueness. The analogy would be a football game where they cut the game to 20 minutes and had a 3 hour halftime. You participate in EAA because of the unique things it offers, just as you attend a football game (primarily) to see the game, not to watch the halftime activities.

  5. #5
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright View Post
    EAA was moving away from its core mission. That didn't go over well with the people who joined EAA because of its uniqueness. The analogy would be a football game where they cut the game to 20 minutes and had a 3 hour halftime. You participate in EAA because of the unique things it offers, just as you attend a football game (primarily) to see the game, not to watch the halftime activities.
    What is its core mission then? Because what people say is experimental is nothing like it was back when EAA started, best I can tell. People actually experimented, changed things, designed their own plane. Now its one company with more than 50% of the planes flying out there, built to cookie cutter specifications, often by for profit builders. How is that experimental, it isn't. It's circumventing the regulations, IMO.

    The real problem, is there is a identity crisis with EAA, no clear mission. Make the mission clear and let the cards fall where they fall.
    Last edited by kscessnadriver; 10-22-2012 at 07:47 PM.
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    Quote Originally Posted by kscessnadriver View Post
    So the simple act of not having an experimental plane or building one should exclude us from the EAA then, is what I'm reading between the lines.
    Not sure what lines you are reading between but nowhere does EAA say they are limited to homebuilts. It's about grassroots aviation. Recently, it's been less about grassroots aviation and more about elitist.

  7. #7
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by martymayes View Post
    Not sure what lines you are reading between but nowhere does EAA say they are limited to homebuilts. It's about grassroots aviation. Recently, it's been less about grassroots aviation and more about elitist.
    First, all the people complain about certified stuff being here and there, and the high dollar contributors getting better perks. Then they go off about how EAA should go back to its roots, which is homebuilts. I think people forget that it takes money to run an organization, and if big sponsors get some perks to go along with large contributions, so be it. That's the way the world works. Aviation an elitist community. The idea that everyone can afford to fly and own an airplane is absurd. Its a middle to upper class activity. Always has been, always will be.

    I see EAA at a crossroads, they can either do what they need to do to survive and potentially thrive. Or they can appease the old timers who want to go back to the "grass roots" of experimental, and let the organization die with the old timers. Which is it going to be?
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    221
    Quote Originally Posted by kscessnadriver View Post
    I see EAA at a crossroads, they can either do what they need to do to survive and potentially thrive. Or they can appease the old timers who want to go back to the "grass roots" of experimental, and let the organization die with the old timers. Which is it going to be?
    An example of Aristotelian logic at its worst. There are an infinite number of possibilities, each with its own probability, not two.
    Bill

  9. #9
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill View Post
    An example of Aristotelian logic at its worst. There are an infinite number of possibilities, each with its own probability, not two.
    Not the way I see it. Young people simply don't get into flying, unless they do it for a career. Those who do it for a career generally don't want anything to do with GA, much less the EAA types. So, how do you propose keeping the organization alive, as the old timers pass on, with no new blood? Have to do something to get new, younger types involved and I feel that's the direction Hightower was going.
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    Quote Originally Posted by kscessnadriver View Post
    Have to do something to get new, younger types involved and I feel that's the direction Hightower was going.
    How many younger types joined EAA in the last year as a result of the new "direction?"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •