Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Backyard Flyer vs Arolite 103

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    3

    Backyard Flyer vs Arolite 103

    I am new to ULs and I'm looking at these two. What are the pros an cons? Is there a better choice for a beginner? Also is there anyplace to fly a UL in SW Indiana?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    FA40
    Posts
    767
    The backyard flyer might be cheaper and easier to store during the winter when it's too cold to fly comfortably? The wing pivots for storage.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike M View Post
    The backyard flyer might be cheaper and easier to store during the winter when it's too cold to fly comfortably? The wing pivots for storage.
    Both are a good choice. Aerolight 103 is in production, I think. Backyard Flyer is not.

    Can you find a good resale on a BF?

    Many differences. What is it you want?
    Nosewheel vs tailwheel?
    Pusher versus tractor?
    Four cycle versus two cycle?
    New versus used?
    Last edited by jedi; 08-14-2019 at 02:51 PM.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    3
    Well I would like a 4 cycle I think it would be more reliable. But is the Back Yard Flyer no longer in production?

  5. #5
    robert l's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Heath Springs, S.C.
    Posts
    590
    Culver Props, Valley Engineering was at A/V in 2017 I believe with their new 2 seat Back Yard Flyer. I don't know anything beyond that.
    Bob

  6. #6
    Airmutt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    NW. Atlanta GA
    Posts
    560
    Valley Engineering is out of business. As an alternative you might consider the Legal Eagle. You can build what you want and there are vendors for components too. The mini-Max is a lower cost alternative to the 103. The 103 is in production and can sometimes be found for sale on various sites such as Barnstormers.
    Dave Shaw
    EAA 67180 Lifetime
    Learn to Build, Build to Fly, Fly for Fun

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    3
    Thanks for the info. I also saw an add for the Kolb Firefly. Would that be good for a beginner?

  8. #8
    Airmutt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    NW. Atlanta GA
    Posts
    560
    There a number of Kolb models. Maybe someone with Kolb experience could respond if you provide more info on
    what you’re looking at. Kolb has been around along time. They are all tail draggers but can’t speak to their ground handling. Have heard that tend to move around a lot but so do most aircraft with a low wing loading.
    Dave Shaw
    EAA 67180 Lifetime
    Learn to Build, Build to Fly, Fly for Fun

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    I watched them build the Aerolite 103 at EAA this year. It definitely looks like fun. I wouldn't hesitate to buy one.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Bountiful, Utah
    Posts
    7
    The Backyard Flier use a modified Generac 40 hp twin 4 stroke that looks really interesting. Its 120 lbs so that makes it 35 lbs heavier than a 50 hp Hirth F23. I just wonder if anyone has tried the Generac motor on on an Aerolite 103. The maker of the Backyard flyier stated it would cruise at just over a gallon per hour. A reliable 4 stroke would be so nice.

    Archie

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •