Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 136

Thread: Changes to OSH Arrivals procedures?

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by flibmeister View Post
    <snip>
    I understand that there have been some changes to the union policy since it's implementation, but not nearly enough-- most of the problems experienced this year can be directly linked to lack of controller skills, and that lack of controller skills can be directly linked to that sudden slashing of the experience level, so many years ago (1992, IIRC).
    Will be VERY interesting to see if the EAA addresses this "lack of experience" issue. Surprised there were no mid-air incidents this past year.

  2. #52
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Santic View Post
    Will be VERY interesting to see if the EAA addresses this "lack of experience" issue. Surprised there were no mid-air incidents this past year.
    Very few midairs ever at Oshkosh. Absent the one that occurred between performers, I think there's been, what one?

  3. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
    Very few midairs ever at Oshkosh. Absent the one that occurred between performers, I think there's been, what one?
    I can verify that there was one between a C170 and a Thorp T-18, somewhere outside of Fisk, in 1990 or so. I was working Fisk at the time, but never saw or communicated with either airplane. First I heard about it was when the EAA Bell 47 (N90B?) called, telling me he'd be flying outbound on the inbound route (but down low), "...looking for the other airplane." When I asked, "...what other airplane?", he informed me that a C170 had landed and reported he thought he might have had a midair out near Fisk, but never saw the other airplane. They found substantial damage on one of the 170's flaps, so sent the 'copter out to look around. He found the Thorp somewhere in a field, south of Fisk, damaged, but (IIRC), with no injuries.

    Then there was the triple fatality (probably the event that eventually brought an end to the flyby pattern), back in 1982 or so. IIRC, that one killed the pilot of a Corbin Baby Ace, and the pilot and his granddaughter in a Starduster II. Both were operating NORDO (as was customary in the flyby pattern back then).

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,205
    I saw a midair collision on 36 with two P-51's. The guy in front was on the runway rollout and the guy behind landed on his tail and bounced high and crashed inverted. Fatal to him.
    I guess it was still a midair since he collided while in flight. They were not in formation or together, as I understand.

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Berson View Post
    I saw a midair collision on 36 with two P-51's. The guy in front was on the runway rollout and the guy behind landed on his tail and bounced high and crashed inverted. Fatal to him.
    I guess it was still a midair since he collided while in flight. They were not in formation or together, as I understand.
    That wasn't an arrival issue, it was a problem in landing aircraft during the warbird portion of the airshow.

  6. #56
    mazdaP5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Just outside of Grosse Ile NAS
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Berson View Post
    I saw a midair collision on 36 with two P-51's. The guy in front was on the runway rollout and the guy behind landed on his tail and bounced high and crashed inverted. Fatal to him.
    I guess it was still a midair since he collided while in flight. They were not in formation or together, as I understand.
    Gerry Beck.

  7. #57
    TedK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pax River MD
    Posts
    365
    It seems to me the root problem is mixing aircraft of different speeds, particularly on the 1800ft MSL/90 KIAS RIPON/FISKE approach. It is the most heavily trafficked approach and can get bottlenecked by slow movers who can’t make 90KIAS.

    If if you can’t slow to 90 you can step up to the 135 altitude. If you need faster still, you can go to Warbird/Turbine/(Heavy) approach.

    Perhaps there should be 4 approaches. Low speed (<90), 90, 135, WTH

  8. #58
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Berson View Post
    I saw a midair collision on 36 with two P-51's. The guy in front was on the runway rollout and the guy behind landed on his tail and bounced high and crashed inverted.
    Are you talking about the one that occurred at the end of the Air Race demonstration? I knew about that one which is why I qualified it to not involving performers.

  9. #59

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,575
    Flying Ron, it should be clear, if you make an effort to understand without my having to have an editor, that my mention of light warbirds able to fly 90 knots safely was so they could use normal Ripon Fisk arrival as Jeff wrote, not for them to fly warbird arrival at 90knots.

  10. #60

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,205
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
    Are you talking about the one that occurred at the end of the Air Race demonstration? I knew about that one which is why I qualified it to not involving performers.
    I have no idea if the two P-51 were performers or not.
    I also watched Roush stall and crash his jet in front of me. That was a traffic conflict.
    My view is that I probably will never fly the Fisk procedure. Mostly because of 60kt top speed, I guess. And the reports I read here about being passed by traffic within 50 feet, 2 hour holding, etc.
    Last edited by Bill Berson; 11-18-2018 at 07:45 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •