Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 86 of 86

Thread: EAA Board of Directors - a lack of diversity

  1. #81

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    927
    Here is some diversity: http://inspire.eaa.org/2018/06/27/rc...4rUUVjN3NMYSJ9

    I have only met one board member and I suspect she was nominated after decades of volunteer service.

  2. #82
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    1,999
    All this drivel would make sense if the EAA board was an openly competed position. It isn't. The board is entierly selected by EAA leadership because they hold sufficient proxies to swamp any "grass roots" attempt to someone else on the board. You can't even pull a "cumulative voting" scheme that is commonly used to allow minority shareholders to get at least one seat on a corporate board. So what you have is a bunch of aging, overweight, white males, with an occasional token alternate. For instance, the two woman on the board are only there because they occupy reserved seats for the heads of Vintage and Warbirds. The only other exception to the white old male farts rule was Jim Clark and he's gone.

  3. #83

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    927
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
    All this drivel would make sense if the EAA board was an openly competed position. It isn't. The board is entierly selected by EAA leadership because they hold sufficient proxies to swamp any "grass roots" attempt to someone else on the board. You can't even pull a "cumulative voting" scheme that is commonly used to allow minority shareholders to get at least one seat on a corporate board. So what you have is a bunch of aging, overweight, white males, with an occasional token alternate. For instance, the two woman on the board are only there because they occupy reserved seats for the heads of Vintage and Warbirds. The only other exception to the white old male farts rule was Jim Clark and he's gone.
    I am available if more underweight white guys are needed for diversity.

  4. #84
    cub builder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    North Central AR
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
    All this drivel would make sense if the EAA board was an openly competed position. It isn't. The board is entierly selected by EAA leadership because they hold sufficient proxies to swamp any "grass roots" attempt to someone else on the board. You can't even pull a "cumulative voting" scheme that is commonly used to allow minority shareholders to get at least one seat on a corporate board. So what you have is a bunch of aging, overweight, white males, with an occasional token alternate. For instance, the two woman on the board are only there because they occupy reserved seats for the heads of Vintage and Warbirds. The only other exception to the white old male farts rule was Jim Clark and he's gone.
    FWIW, I don't think the derogatory adjectives add to the discussion. But the jist of your post is right on the mark. The EAA board is there to serve and promote themselves and they do not want outsiders on the board unless they can bring a pile of $$ donors with them. They also will not allow an outsider onto the board as they hold the proxy votes. Anyone that thinks the EAA board is an elected democracy is deluding themselves. That doesn't mean the board doesn't do any good or that a diversity based board would be any better. In fact, the fact that many of the board members can bring a lot of donation $$ to the table is good for the EAA, or at least Airventure Inc.

  5. #85
    The most qualified for the position is the standard at the E.A.A.. The "diversity" attitude will make things not nearly as safe and sound versus having qualified people running the show.

  6. #86

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,497
    Quote Originally Posted by Yellowhammer View Post
    The most qualified for the position is the standard at the E.A.A.. The "diversity" attitude will make things not nearly as safe and sound versus having qualified people running the show.
    I see that you are new to the forum and very, very late to this particular thread party. You can't make unsubstantiated statements like this. You can have an opinion but you can't have your own facts. I know, for some, it's in vogue and all the rage but you can't just make up s**t.

    Provide supportable, fact based evidence that proves your contention that "the diversity attitude will make things not nearly as safe and sound versus having qualified people running the show."

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •