Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Stewart Covering System

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    19

    Stewart Covering System

    I've done a search on here and have read some old postings concerning Stewarts, but I'm hoping to hear from current users. Anything pro or con you'd like to share. I'm building a Kitfox SS7 and not sure which covering process I'm going to use. I like the non toxic Stewart system but have never used it. Again, looking for any info. Thanks
    Brian

  2. #2
    Tralika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    78
    I used the Stewart's System on my Highlander. I built and painted the plane in my garage which is attached to my house. I couldn't use any of the solvent based products because even with a good ventilation system there is no way to keep the smell out of the house. You will still need a ventilation system and use a respirator when spraying but there is almost no smell. The glue is the best, very easy to use and very forgiving. I used a four stage turbine sprayer which Stewart's says can work but they do not recommend it. I had trouble getting the paint to flow out smoothly and had to do a lot of trial settings and practice. Since this is the first time I've painted anything with spray equipment I don't know if it would have made any difference what type of paint I used. It still would have been a steep learning curve.

    I ended up with a paint job that I look at and can see all the mistakes but everyone else seems to think it looks great. If you use Stewart's follow their recommendations on setting up the compressor and spray equipment. Buy the Stewart's DVD's and watch them closely. Keep in mind that they have re-formulated the paint since the videos were made so it is not mixed or applied exactly the same way. You still want to watch the videos because the basic process is the same and they offer lots of good info and tips. The paint is mixed by weight now which is very easy to do but you will need a digital scale and take your time. The good news is the paint now has a much longer pot life, up to 3 hours, up from 45 minutes.

    Follow the written instructions that come with the paint and don't be afraid to ask questions on the Stewart's forum or call them directly. They were very helpful to me. You can look at my build log for details on my covering and painting process. I just had my inspection and received my Airworthiness Certificate yesterday!
    John Nealon
    mykitlog.com/jnealon

    Name:  DSC04147.jpg
Views: 2148
Size:  98.6 KB
    Last edited by Tralika; 11-05-2017 at 10:36 AM.

  3. #3
    cub builder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    North Central AR
    Posts
    456
    I have covered several planes using nitrate/butyrate dopes, Polyfibre, and have supervised two recovers with Stewarts. All end up with equally fine finishes. If I recover a plane again, it will be with Stewarts. As previously stated, follow the Stewart directions to the letter and it will work out just fine. If going onto an experimental, I would consider deviating only in the finish coat for a less expensive and easier to work with Polyurethane or maybe even an Acrylic Urethane. But up to the finish coat, I would follow to the letter. If going onto a certificated aircraft, I would follow to the letter through the finish, as required by the STC.

  4. #4
    Jeff Point's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    309
    I covered and painted my Breezy with Stewarts. Highly recommended. They had some issues early on but seem to have worked through them. Longevity is still an unknown but with 42 hours on the plane, so far so good.

    No need to buy the DVDs as Stewart's has put the videos up on YouTube for free. You can learn a lot about their system from those at no cost.
    Jeff Point
    RV-6 and RLU-1 built & flying
    Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
    Milwaukee, WI
    "It All Started Here!"

  5. #5
    Jim Heffelfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California, United States
    Posts
    416
    Here are 2 planes in Stewarts from my chapter. The S-18 has 1100+ hours on it. The -8 is still in the final assy stage but the paint is excellent. a "2 foot" paint job.

    Name:  Project_RV-8_color_background_edit.jpg
Views: 1704
Size:  92.2 KB
    Name:  After the flight.jpg
Views: 1726
Size:  96.8 KB
    Last edited by Jim Heffelfinger; 11-12-2017 at 11:56 PM.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,609
    I have a CD set that came from Steward systems. These CD's explain all that is needed to cover an airplane. They cover or show how to cover every piece of an airplane in the cd set. If I can find a link to this cd set I will post it. Maybe others here have more info on this. This was given to me by an eaa member.

    Tony

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    963
    Those videos are in the public domain on YouTube now. A search for "Stewart systems" should find them.

  8. #8
    Sam Buchanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    KDCU
    Posts
    567
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright View Post
    Those videos are in the public domain on YouTube now. A search for "Stewart systems" should find them.
    Stewart Systems videos
    Sam Buchanan
    The RV Journal RV-6 build log
    Fokker D.VII semi-replica build log

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,236
    I have nothing but good things to say about the Stewart system for covering.

    The glue is super user friendly. Since it's heat activated, one can position and re-position fabric at will right up to the point of putting the iron to it. One can even leave it on (pre-heated) and come back to it later. It is tacky, so obviously one won't want to leave it uncovered for too long. I only used a clamp or two in initial lining up of large pieces of fabric, but did a "tack weld" with the iron in some spots and then removed the clamps.

    Like everything in building, it's easy to learn and somewhat difficult to master - my very amateur learn-from-video covering job isn't going to win any awards - but it's all straight forward and just a matter of taking time to improve techniques. I can throw fabric around a tight bend without a crease - only to make it look horrible by botching up the tapes. Grrrr.

    Now, then, a caveat: I didn't use any of the Stewart fill or paint products, and it seems a lot of complaints come from them. For my little Nieuport I used good Household Exterior primer and paints, which worked out great.
    The opinions and statements of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Michigan United States
    Posts
    40
    Name:  10393910_906252536069397_3560954327194722152_n.jpg
Views: 1646
Size:  72.4 KBThe Stewart System products work well, they are DIFFERENT than the other products that I have used, CAB dope, enamels. The big issue with Stewart is,or was if the formulations have changed, is that it IS NOT fuel proof with auto gas. The undercoatings and glue will hold up to 100LL avgas but auto gas,Possibly the "cleaning additives"which are in E0 recreational gas as well, will dissolve them both. The poly top coat will be okay but the finish will blister and glued seams can separate. Just something to be aware of.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •