Fascist??? That must just be the new buzzword for people who say things we don't agree with. I think I've heard it used more in the past few months than in the twenty years prior combined.
Of the ten instruments listed in the reg referenced earlier in this thread, a few simply are not applicable to most new experimental planes. Specifically manifold pressure, landing gear indicator, and either water or oil temp. I found it interesting that even a slip indicator isn't required. So what you're left with is:
Airspeed indicator.
Altimeter.
Magnetic direction indicator.
Tachometer.
Oil pressure gauge.
Temperature gauge (either oil or coolant)
Fuel gauge for each tank.
Measure twice, cut once...
scratch head, shrug, shim to fit.
Flying an RV-12. I am building a Fisher Celebrity, slowly.
Naaawwww.....you shouldn't have any difficulty with a DAR because they are very familiar with the Operating Limitations since they have to type the things up so you can include them in your aircraft docs. I've received Experimental Airworthiness Certificates from DAR's for three aircraft over the past twenty years, each aircraft lacking the full complement of "official" instruments. The last one, a Fokker D.VII replica had a really sparse panel when the inspection occurred. In each case, the DAR had no issues with the panel since the op lims clearly stated the aircraft was only to be operated daytime VFR unless equipped per 91.205. It is the responsibility of the pilot to make sure the aircraft is properly equipped for any particular flight, not the DAR.
Last edited by Sam Buchanan; 09-06-2017 at 04:29 PM.
Opinion noted. Doesn't seem to be an avalanche of 91.13 violations in FAA enforcement action records. When it gets down the the gritty, can't enforce something that doesn't exist.
Over the years, I've seen a number of homebuilts that didn't have a magnetic direction indicator. Zip, Nada. Don't know if they were originally equipped without or removed later.I would be interested to hear from anyone who's either attempted or succeeded in getting an AC from a FSDO or DAR with missing 91.205(b) instruments, and during the attempt, what the response was to pointing out that 8130.2<x> doesn't anywhere explicitly require 91.205(b) compliance.
Marc referenced 91.205, which makes clear several instruments are of the "if applicable" sort. Oil pressure gauges if using an engine with a pressurized oil system (e.g., two-strokes are off the hook), temperature gauges for liquid-cooled engines, landing gear position indicator if the plane has retractable gear, etc. A glider will thus require only three (assuming the gear doesn't retract), and most engines can't escape two or three of the remaining.
Hmmm, steam powerplant probably could.
Anyway, as was rightly pointed out, 91.205 is specifically applicable only to standard-category aircraft, but as stated, the chance of a DAR giving you your ticket if you LACK one of the "required" instruments might be a bit low.
Two lovely loopholes in the reg. The first deals with the altimeter; one is required for VFR but a SENSITIVE one is required for IFR. The single-arm Cub types are OK for VFR, and, if I remember right, they don't even have to be adjustable for local pressure.
The other factor is the lack of a compliance specification. We have to have an airspeed...and...altimeter...and tachometer, but all they have to do is provide the aircraft speed, altitude, and engine RPM, respectively. The spring & vane type olde fashioned airspeed indicator is legal. GPS altitude readout would probably be legal for VFR, though a thousand or so fathoms of lead line might be a scary option. And lots of guys, including myself, use stuff like Tiny Tachs.
Ron Wanttaja
Last edited by rwanttaja; 09-06-2017 at 06:52 PM.
Gee, I wonder why?😏
Hardly a new buzzword, goes back 100 years. It's not used to describe people who say things we don't agree with. It's used to describe or label political regimes or individuals who engage in totalitarian practices that will not tolerate anyone or anything with differing opinions and opposing viewpoints. Full disclosure: I was a Poli Sci Major.
I stand corrected - thank you for the information.
And thanks to all the folks that felt the need to respond with insults to a comment that I had already retracted due to another comment that reminded me of the particular applicability (or lack thereof) of the regs. I was wrong and I said so prior to your comments - how often do most folks do that on these fora?
Marc J. Zeitlin
marc_zeitlin@alum.mit.edu
www.cozybuilders.org/
www.burnsideaerospace.com
Copyright © 2024
I think fascism is an economic system defined by central state control of business. Central control tends to allow a dictatorship takeover. An economic system made up of individual and freely trading private businesses cannot be centrally controlled by dictators.
Last edited by Bill Berson; 09-06-2017 at 09:00 PM.
Floats and Bill B, maybe right bark, but up the wrong tree. This topic is about flight instruments, not fascism.
Yeah.
I built a motorglider powered by two Tecumseh engines. The FAA inspector told me he could not issue an airworthiness certificate without an oil pressure guage. The engines didn't have an oil pump.
Cant argue with the authority.