Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Transponder check required?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    35

    Question Transponder check required?

    Does a new install on a newly homebuilt airplane need a transponder cert? Regardless of EAB or ELSA? I'm talking VFR only.

    Thank You

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    21

    transponder check IS required

    According to 14 CFR 91.413, a transponder may not be used for the above purposes unless, within the preceding 24 calendar months, the ATC transponder has been tested and inspected and found to comply with appendix F of FAR Part 43.
    for "above purposes" see
    http://www.aopa.org/Pilot-Resources/...r-Requirements

    The use of a transponder in airspace does not reflect what aircraft it is in.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gwinn, Michigan
    Posts
    243
    Even though not required unless you are going to be flying IFR, I would go with the added expense of an encoder also. ATC will be able to see you better and know your altitude and speed to warn other planes to be cautious of your wake turbulence.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    47
    Any use of Class A, B, or C will require you to install and have certified a transponder (Modes A and C)... Any use of a TRSA will require at least the Mode A transponder (installed and certified).

    But why not just skip ahead and meet the ADS-B requirements instead?

  5. #5
    Jim Hann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ballwin, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by 67jwbruce View Post
    Any use of Class A, B, or C will require you to install and have certified a transponder (Modes A and C)... Any use of a TRSA will require at least the Mode A transponder (installed and certified).

    But why not just skip ahead and meet the ADS-B requirements instead?
    I agree with the ADS-B if you can afford it. Remember it doesn't have to be certificated equipment in an E-AB The equipment just has to meet the performance standards, so it has to pass the test that is required under 14CFR91
    Jim Hann
    EAA 276294 Lifetime
    Vintage 722607
    1957 Piper PA-22/20 "Super Pacer"
    Chapter 32 member www.eaa32.org
    www.mykitlog.com/LinerDrivr
    Fly Baby/Hevle Classic Tandem


  6. #6
    MPerkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois (Havana)
    Posts
    17
    This is the way I understand it. . . . To fly in Mode-C areas beginning in 2020, the aircraft must still be equipped with a Mode-C transponder, even if it's equipped with ADS-B out. I understand that the FAA has no immediate plans to remove the Mode-C transponder requirement, even with ADS-B out, if that ADS-B out is a UAT transmitter. However, if you were to choose a 1090ES version of ADS-B out, it can be used in place of a transponder because it operates with traditional radar and TCAS, in addition to providing the function of ADS-B out. Actually, 1090ES ADS-B is a transponder, but has "extended squitter," meaning it sends the additional data required for ADS-B. The reason is that TCAS still depends on transponders (or 1090ES ADS-B). So I don't think you can really "skip ahead" to ADS-B out and avoid installing a transponder, unless it's 1090ES. Check me on this, but this was my reference: https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/programs/adsb/faq/#21

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    155
    I have used ATC as a transponder check source here in Calif desert area. If we fly early on a Sunday morning when ATC has little activity and ask for a sqwauk, they usually are happy to respond and we compare altitude readings. Whole process takes less than a minute. If readings are within 100', I call it good. It's not a legal check but can indicate if something is out of spec.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by MPerkins View Post
    This is the way I understand it. . . . To fly in Mode-C areas beginning in 2020, the aircraft must still be equipped with a Mode-C transponder, even if it's equipped with ADS-B out. I understand that the FAA has no immediate plans to remove the Mode-C transponder requirement, even with ADS-B out, if that ADS-B out is a UAT transmitter. However, if you were to choose a 1090ES version of ADS-B out, it can be used in place of a transponder because it operates with traditional radar and TCAS, in addition to providing the function of ADS-B out. Actually, 1090ES ADS-B is a transponder, but has "extended squitter," meaning it sends the additional data required for ADS-B. The reason is that TCAS still depends on transponders (or 1090ES ADS-B). So I don't think you can really "skip ahead" to ADS-B out and avoid installing a transponder, unless it's 1090ES. Check me on this, but this was my reference: https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/programs/adsb/faq/#21
    Thanks!

  9. #9
    Jim Hann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ballwin, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by MPerkins View Post
    This is the way I understand it. . . . To fly in Mode-C areas beginning in 2020, the aircraft must still be equipped with a Mode-C transponder, even if it's equipped with ADS-B out. I understand that the FAA has no immediate plans to remove the Mode-C transponder requirement, even with ADS-B out, if that ADS-B out is a UAT transmitter. However, if you were to choose a 1090ES version of ADS-B out, it can be used in place of a transponder because it operates with traditional radar and TCAS, in addition to providing the function of ADS-B out. Actually, 1090ES ADS-B is a transponder, but has "extended squitter," meaning it sends the additional data required for ADS-B. The reason is that TCAS still depends on transponders (or 1090ES ADS-B). So I don't think you can really "skip ahead" to ADS-B out and avoid installing a transponder, unless it's 1090ES. Check me on this, but this was my reference: https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/programs/adsb/faq/#21
    MPerkins is correct. What I was thinking was it would be worth doing the work (or at least laying the ground work so to speak) during construction versus having to tear the airplane apart to make the addition/upgrade. Doing something once is almost always cheaper than doing it twice.
    Jim Hann
    EAA 276294 Lifetime
    Vintage 722607
    1957 Piper PA-22/20 "Super Pacer"
    Chapter 32 member www.eaa32.org
    www.mykitlog.com/LinerDrivr
    Fly Baby/Hevle Classic Tandem


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •