Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Help Design an Airplane!

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3

    Help Design an Airplane!

    I'm a professional aerospace design engineer by trade and a GA pilot for fun. I spent the last 4 years building a Glasair SII. It was a heck of a project and I'm glad to have it finished & flying.

    Over the course of building this airplane, I learned a lot. It got me thinking - maybe I could design and build an airplane too?

    After visiting Oshkosh for the first time this year I realized that if I did start my own project - I wouldn't be alone. I was amazed at the help and support out there for every aviation project imaginable.

    The project starts with you- the experimental aviation community. I'd like you to have the opportunity to weigh in on what's important to you in an airplane.

    You can do this by completing this very simple, 30 second, 10 question survey:

    https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LCRNW59

    I plan to publish the results assuming I get a statistically significant response. So - if you are interested in what the survey says - please fill it out!

    Thanks,

    Fly More

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ma. Fla
    Posts
    26
    Took your survey,some good questions.

  3. #3
    gbrasch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    530
    Took it, good luck.
    Glenn Brasch
    KRYN Tucson, Arizona
    2013 RV-9A
    Medevac helicopter pilot (Ret)
    EAA member since 1980
    Owner, "Airport Courtesy Cars" website.
    www.airportcourtesycars.com
    Volunteer Mentor www.SoAZTeenAviation.org

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Beecher, IL
    Posts
    7
    Completed the survey. I'd like to see a much cooler looking version of a Onex, with more HP, retractable gear, higher speeds, and constant speed prop. I'd still like it all metal, fairly easy to build, and fairly user-friendly to land. ...that's my dream!

    Nick

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,236
    There needs to be a comment section, as "better" means different things to different people. For example, I listed "speed" as very important in a design, as I prefer slower aircraft. Anything faster than 70 MPH and it's missing the point of flying over field and hill and enjoying the sights, which is why I'm up in the air to begin with.

    I think if there was a "mission" question asking what the aircraft would be used for - transportation or leisure - it might help put context to the answers.

    But I think it's a neat idea and want to thank you for engaging in a project like this.
    The opinions and statements of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Fairbanks, Alaska
    Posts
    69
    Good survey. I just took it. All that I want is a 4-6 seat amphibian that lands at 30kts. cruises at 250kts has a 1200 mile range, burns around 4gph and can be built with little or no skills for under 20,000 I was just a little confused about the question about ground transportation. It seems most would answer "yes" since it's usually handy to have transportation when arriving at an airport. I'm guessing it's about airplane design...like a roadable aircraft/flying car or at least one with enough room to carry a bicycle.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3
    66 responses now!

    I'd like to get to at least 100. If you haven't taken it already, please take this very simple airplane design survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LCRNW59

    Some interesting results so far.

    - Not a whole lot of people want aerobatic capability
    - Not a whole lot of people want water landing capability
    - Purchase price is #1 most important item.
    - Looks are more important than speed & range

    Keep 'em coming folks.

    Fly More

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Fly More View Post
    66 responses now!



    Some interesting results so far.


    - Not a whole lot of people want water landing capability




    Fly More
    That's because they don't want to have maximum fun when they fly.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3
    THE RESULTS

    Thank you to the 100 people that responded. Here is a summary of the results

    % Pilots 91%
    % Have/want an airplane 96%

    Approximate geographical location
    US Northwest 17%
    US Southwest 18%
    US Central 24%
    US Northeast 14%
    US Southeast 18%
    Other location 9%

    Average Age 47.5

    Ranking of most important Airplane Features
    1 Purchase Price
    2 Fuel Economy
    3 Payload
    4 Speed
    5 Take off/landing distance
    6 Simple to build
    7 Range
    8 Looks
    9 Baggage Capacity
    10 Aerobatic capability
    11 Water landing
    (some of these were very close)

    Please indicate how often you do or would carry the following number of passengers:

    % Often/always
    One 61%
    Two 20%
    Three 8%
    Three+ 2%

    - A large majority of pilots do not need an LSA

    - About half of pilots do not require folding wings

    - The vast majority of pilots would like some form of ground transport


    ------------------------------------------------------



    So what's next?

    I'm going to feed these results back into my design requirements. Fortunately they align pretty well with what I want to design, and this has been a great validation exercise.

    Watch this space.

    Fly More

  10. #10
    Richard Warner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Covington, LA
    Posts
    83
    Very good survey. It needs some clarification on the ground transportation question.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •