I think many people like to grade their landings in their mind and I do also, on a scale of 10. Most of mine are 8 or 9. There's really no safety difference between a 7 and a 10, both are safe in most planes. Now if you are flying a Pitts or ME-109 every one may need to be a 9 or 10.
Anyway, these days I mostly fly a Bonanza and they are famous for being easy and forgiving to land. Mine is a B36 with the larger fuselage and the longer wings, so it does loose some aileron effectiveness as you get slower, but you just have to make bigger control movements. And it stalls a little faster than the earlier lighter v tail ones. Still it is pretty forgiving, so it is too easy to get a little complacent and accept an 8 rather than a 9 or 10. The difference is that for the really best landing I need to keep making corrections all the way to the ground, and mostly it is a matter of making a full flare, not dropping in or rolling on the nosewheel.
I came back to Aspen 2 days ago, the weather had been poor, windy and overcast but now was great, calm and CAVU.
I just kept making corrections all the way down and my landing was a 10 !. In thinking about it afterwards I can't see any way to improve on that one. It was on center, nose straight, right speed, a full flare and a touchdown so smooth that one second I am flying and the next I am rolling.
I don't make many that good and while it is more a matter of style than safety, that one made me smile all afternoon. I'm thnking, "Man that was easy, and I'm really good, and why aren't all the rest that perfect."
Now, can I do it on the next one?