Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: UK Stitts Playboy

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7

    UK Stitts Playboy

    I am rebuilding a Stitts SA3A Playboy which was originally built by D J Stadler of Wenatchee WA in 1973 and was registered N9996. It had been completely stripped down after an accident and has been re-covered and I am now putting it back together again, aiming to get it back in the air this spring. We have a part complete C65 but are looking around for a C90 and I am thinking of fitting a removable canopy so that it will be more of an all- season aeroplane, something like a sliding Pitts canopy which I believe it had some years ago but has since been removed. It sounds like it will be great fun to fly and it would be great to hear from any Playboy owners and pilots for their tips and advice.

    Happy New Year to all EAAers from UKRoger

  2. #2
    prasmussen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    2OH8
    Posts
    109
    Name:  Stits Playboy.jpg
Views: 2207
Size:  76.5 KBName:  1961 Playboy.jpg
Views: 1905
Size:  84.8 KBName:  SA-3A.jpg
Views: 1129
Size:  54.4 KBName:  Stitts SA-3A-1.jpg
Views: 1289
Size:  96.2 KBName:  Stitts SA-3A.jpg
Views: 1317
Size:  55.6 KB

    Just thought you might be interested in these images. I have a SA-3A on the gear with a C-85 but, frankly, it has been stalled for several years. Have all the parts, just have to make the time to put them together. Any pictures of the UKPlayboy?

    Best of luck!
    The journey is the reward.

  3. #3
    prasmussen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    2OH8
    Posts
    109
    Name:  Playboy at Oshkosh.jpg
Views: 1321
Size:  68.9 KB
    And then just one more. Have to imagine it bright red.....
    The journey is the reward.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    Thanks for the photos, that first one has a very neat canopy. Haven't got any photos at the moment, I am off to have a look at another engine tomorrow, a C-65 again but complete. I spoke to someone over here who has flown one and he says that they are great fun!

  5. #5
    prasmussen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    2OH8
    Posts
    109
    Been years but I wrote to the EAA library about the Playboy and they had some helpful information. My plans were (are) early ones and there have apparently been some improvements/changes to the landing gear truss and rear spar attachment. They also had some accident information which made me feel a lot better about our strut-braced wings. And when I mentioned flaperons, they pulled out several magazine articles which actually talked me out of trying them.

    Best, P.
    The journey is the reward.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    That's interesting about the EAA library having some information. On your plans do you have any rigging incidence angles for wings and tail just so I can check that ours is right and has it got any washout? Have bought the engine so just need a prop now, next job is spraying colour. We intend to have the same colour scheme as the original Playboy.

  7. #7
    prasmussen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    2OH8
    Posts
    109
    I know one of the issues builders were supposed to pay special attention to was the angle of incidence affected by rear spar attachments. What I decided to do is buried somewhere in the chaos of my project. May take a while but I'll see what I can find.

    Name:  Playboy Pix.jpg
Views: 1298
Size:  98.3 KB

    Sounds like you should be ready to fly soon! Hope it goes well. Pictures?
    The journey is the reward.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    Thanks very much, will get some pictures organised. I am aiming to have it in the air this spring.

  9. #9
    prasmussen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    2OH8
    Posts
    109
    BTW, about half the pictures I see locate the fuselage end of the wing struts at the front of the cockpit. Another group of Playboys use two attach points at the fore and aft. Any particular reasons for that you've heard?
    The journey is the reward.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    I would imagine that the later aircraft had both struts going to one fixing point forward of the cockpit to make access easier,otherwise you had to step over one strut.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •