Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Applied load factor

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Mike Switzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    979

    Applied load factor

    Question: I see many experimental designs advertised as being designed for 9 gs. Does this mean they are designing for the 6 g applied load factor required by the FAA for aerobatic flight x a 1.5 factor of safety, or are they using 9 g as the base load factor which x 1.5 means they are designing the airframe to handle 13.5 g ultimate loads?

    (it makes a big difference in airframe weight)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    963
    Mike, your first assumption (6 G design load, 9 G failure) is typical. Van's RV-3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 are that way.

  3. #3
    Mike Switzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    979
    Thanks. That's what I assumed, but you know what happens when you assume....

    While strength / weight is not really a 1:1 when using structural members, I'd hate to try to design something for 13.5 g

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon / USA
    Posts
    64
    13.5 would be instant blackout city for most of us. 9 would almost certainly put me out too. When we can redesign humans for 12 g then we should design wings for 13.5. :-) Just my 2c.

  5. #5
    Mike Switzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    979
    I'm starting (preliminary) work on the fuselage geometry & I have to program the formulas into MathCad & Excel for the static analysis. (Starting with pencil scratchin's on paper, this stuff will change a lot before I am done)

    (I'm sure glad I'm not doing a composite or riveted aluminum structure, then I would feel like I had to do finite element analysis, and the last time I did FEA was 24 years ago (by hand, on paper), I don't ever want to do that again, even with software that i don't want to spend money on...)

  6. #6
    Dana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    927
    I don't know what the kit builders are advertising, but if an aircraft has a 6g design load factor with a 9g ultimate, it should be advertised as 6g. The 1.5 safety factor is just that, a fudge factor for the engineering calculations, not a usable number a pilot should be concerned with.

    If you have a 6g design load factor, the plane only must not actually break at 9g... but it's allowed to bend past 6g, and stay bent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •