Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: FAA wants $500,000 or No AirVenture That adds up to $10,000 per AirTraffic Controller

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Wrongway Feldman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Some where in the South Pacific,I also do Flyovers for the Green Bay Packers Home Games,GO PacK GO!!
    Posts
    274

    FAA wants $500,000 or No AirVenture That adds up to $10,000 per AirTraffic Controller

    My understanding is the FAA provides EAA AirVenture with one hundred FAA employees,
    Fifty of them are actually performing Air Traffic Control tower duties.
    FAA wants $500,000 for the one hundred FAA employees for the AirVenture week.
    That would add up to $5,000 per FAA employee!
    Or $10,000 per Air Traffic Controller for the fifty that are actually performing Air Traffic Control tower duties.
    Why not tell the FAA to send the other fifty FAA employees home, that are not Helping Air Planes Land and save yourself $250,000

    Sequestration can work both ways.

    Below are links to Local News Stories on the topic:

    WBAY TV 2 News, Video & Text


    WLUK TV 11 News, Video & Text

    Postcrescent News Paper, Video & Text
    Last edited by Wrongway Feldman; 06-05-2013 at 08:00 AM.

  2. #2
    TedK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pax River MD
    Posts
    365
    Yep... My quick math indicates a fully burdened rate for a Controller is about $3400 per week. Add in travel, food and lodging and $5000 seems about right.

    Perhaps we simply should invite the President! Then we would get all the Controllers we could stand.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Klapka View Post
    Perhaps we simply should invite the President! Then we would get all the Controllers we could stand.
    Nah....then we'd have a no fly zone for 2 days! Wouldn't need ATC.

  4. #4
    TedK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pax River MD
    Posts
    365
    What if I offered him a ride? I have to fly past the DC FRZ anyhow to get to OSH.

    Would that make my callsign "GenAv One"?

  5. #5
    rwanttaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,951
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Klapka View Post
    What if I offered him a ride? I have to fly past the DC FRZ anyhow to get to OSH.

    Would that make my callsign "GenAv One"?
    No, it's "Executive One."

    Ron Wanttaja

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11
    So, what I am really wondering is why the controllers for the show are paid, in the first place.

    I thought the entire show was run by volunteers, with a few exceptions.

  7. #7
    Richard Warner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Covington, LA
    Posts
    83
    Nah....then we'd have a no fly zone for 2 days! Wouldn't need ATC.

    You took the words right out of my mouth. Maybe some idiot will tell him that there are 300,000+ people at Oshkosh and he should go there and make a money raising speech. Shut my mouth for even thinking that!!!!!

  8. #8
    EAA Staff / Moderator Hal Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States
    Posts
    1,296
    Nobody has paid anything at this point. This situation is far, far from over.

    Hal Bryan
    EAA Lifetime 638979
    Vintage 714005 | Warbirds 553527
    Managing Editor
    EAA—The Spirit of Aviation

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,205
    President Reagan fired all 12,000 controllers in the 80’s. Catastrophe was predicted,but didn't happen, as I recall.
    Sometimes it takes a bold leader.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,718
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Berson View Post
    President Reagan fired all 12,000 controllers in the 80’s. Catastrophe was predicted,but didn't happen, as I recall.
    Sometimes it takes a bold leader.
    Catastrophe didn't happen because there was sufficient time to put a comprehensive, almost seemless alternative plan in place to avert catastrophe that gave Reagan the hammer to fire them. At the moment they were fired the plan to replace them with military controllers immediately went into effect. It's wasn't about being bold at all, it was having the time to carefully think about alternative action and implement it.

    The EAA in the fight with FAA has not been given the luxury of time to plan contingencies. That's why the FAA has us by the short and curlies!(so far).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •