Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: ER70S6 vs RG45

  1. #21
    Aaron Novak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wi
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Switzer View Post
    I would think they would have had problems burning holes thru the tube.
    Not once you get the hang of it. Actually the larger filler is easier when welding hot and fast as it acts as a heat sink.

    Sam,
    Not picking at what you chose to do, just adding a historical perspective. My guess is that your preference came from being unexperienced and trying to learn using too large of a filler with the RG, and that the difference you saw was due more to wire size than alloy ( and there is nothing wrong with that ). Im sorry if you were offended by the suggestion of trying something else, but I do still stand by it. If you want to try some RG-60 and RG-45 in 1/16 let me know and I will send a few pieces your way.

  2. #22
    Mike Switzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron Novak View Post
    Not once you get the hang of it. Actually the larger filler is easier when welding hot and fast as it acts as a heat sink.
    What size tip would you use welding thin tube with 1/8" rod? (For Smith AW1A if you know it, otherwise I can look at the cross reference chart)

  3. #23
    Sam Buchanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    KDCU
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron Novak View Post
    Sam,
    Not picking at what you chose to do, just adding a historical perspective. My guess is that your preference came from being unexperienced and trying to learn using too large of a filler with the RG, and that the difference you saw was due more to wire size than alloy ( and there is nothing wrong with that ). Im sorry if you were offended by the suggestion of trying something else, but I do still stand by it. If you want to try some RG-60 and RG-45 in 1/16 let me know and I will send a few pieces your way.
    No offense taken, it's just that I'm happy with the results I got with ER70S6. And if you prefer to use RG....I'm fine with that.

    I did a lot of reading in the course of getting ready to weld the Eagle fuse, and it seems the ER fillers are rapidly gaining acceptance in oxy-gas welding. No doubt this is reflected in the move to ER filler by the highly regarded Tinman guys. RG has a lot of field history and is still the go-to filler for a lot of welders, but it is no longer the only option.
    Of course, nearly everyone will be using TIG in years to come so this will all be moot.
    Sam Buchanan
    The RV Journal RV-6 build log
    Fokker D.VII semi-replica build log

  4. #24
    Mike Switzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Buchanan View Post
    Of course, nearly everyone will be using TIG in years to come so this will all be moot.
    Yea, right... I can't afford that. Well, I probably could, but I can't justify it when a torch does the job for a lot less. Especially when my buddy has a tig if I really really want it welded that way.

  5. #25
    Aaron Novak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wi
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Buchanan View Post
    No offense taken, it's just that I'm happy with the results I got with ER70S6. And if you prefer to use RG....I'm fine with that.

    I did a lot of reading in the course of getting ready to weld the Eagle fuse, and it seems the ER fillers are rapidly gaining acceptance in oxy-gas welding. No doubt this is reflected in the move to ER filler by the highly regarded Tinman guys. RG has a lot of field history and is still the go-to filler for a lot of welders, but it is no longer the only option.
    Of course, nearly everyone will be using TIG in years to come so this will all be moot.
    Still going to want a torch if youre using 4130....... Besides I dont feel like getting skin cancer if I can avoid it.........

  6. #26
    Sam Buchanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    KDCU
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron Novak View Post
    Still going to want a torch if youre using 4130....... Besides I dont feel like getting skin cancer if I can avoid it.........
    I like using a torch, sorta old-school.

    But a torch is scarcely seen these days in aircraft production or race car shops that fabricate with 4130.

    And I'm dealing with skin cancer already, not from TIG but from living on a planet illuminated by a huge UV generator...........life is risky.......
    Last edited by Sam Buchanan; 01-03-2013 at 01:13 PM.
    Sam Buchanan
    The RV Journal RV-6 build log
    Fokker D.VII semi-replica build log

  7. #27
    Aaron Novak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wi
    Posts
    361
    Yep rarely seen, mostly due to economic and marketing reasons, I mean hey, who doesnt love some shiny machine with all sorts of knobs and displays on it in their shop, makes it look like you know what you are doing to the uneducated.........

    BTW I own and use 2 very nice inverter Tigs in my own shop......so my choice of technology for a given application is driven by engineering reasons, not personal capability.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45
    Gday chaps,A most interesting discussion,Here in Aussie the mig wire I use is the er70s6, it would seem then that I can tack weld my fuse frame with the mig and then either tig weld or oxy weld the frame with the same er70s6 filler rod,how convenient.I just wonder at whether there is a different melt point between the 70 series fill rod and the rg 45 and 60.Any thoughts? Ross

  9. #29
    Aaron Novak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Oshkosh, Wi
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by eiclan View Post
    Gday chaps,A most interesting discussion,Here in Aussie the mig wire I use is the er70s6, it would seem then that I can tack weld my fuse frame with the mig and then either tig weld or oxy weld the frame with the same er70s6 filler rod,how convenient.I just wonder at whether there is a different melt point between the 70 series fill rod and the rg 45 and 60.Any thoughts? Ross
    Ross,
    Only a few degrees difference between the fillers. Provided the tacks are small, I dont really see an issue tacking with a Mig, however I guess I dont see an advantage either. You would have to be sure that the weld would completely re-melt the tack( including the parent metal under it ) forming a wider fillet than the tack itself in the end. Tacking with an O/A torch takes a couple seconds, same for tig, and the tacks are very controlled. I would think tacking with a mig would be cumbersome, producing large, "cold" tacks, and thus would be my personal last choice.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45
    Gday Aaron,You are right in respect to "cold tacks" produced by the mig welder but as someone who has built many experimental agricultural machine and have tacked them all together and built them and then dismantled them and fully welded,the production of a good tack weld is very important for not only the structural integrity but also the squareness of the finished product. The trick to getting the mig to produce a good small and strong tack weld is to ensure as higher amperage as is possible,commensurate with the thickness of the material,with the least amount of wire feed.Wire feed controls the size of the pool,amps the heat of the pool.the more wire the larger the tack.Because the tack weld is of short duration the amps need to be high to get full penetration while less wire ensures a flat tack weld. Cheers Ross

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •