Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Old Sheet Metal Cross Reference

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1

    Old Sheet Metal Cross Reference

    I知 repairing a flap on my 1959 PA-22/20 and I'm trying to identify the kind of aluminum piper used. I know the industry changed the way they identified sheet aluminum alloys from a 2 digit identifier to a 4 digit identifier somewhere along the way. I知 looking for a cross reference of some kind that would help me translate the old identification to the newer alloy identification.

    The only markings I can make out on the original part are;

    3S

    H14 (hardness)

    24S-1

    .02 (thickness)

    Daryl

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New London WI
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by AVPacer View Post
    I知 repairing a flap on my 1959 PA-22/20 and I'm trying to identify the kind of aluminum piper used. I know the industry changed the way they identified sheet aluminum alloys from a 2 digit identifier to a 4 digit identifier somewhere along the way. I知 looking for a cross reference of some kind that would help me translate the old identification to the newer alloy identification.

    The only markings I can make out on the original part are;

    3S

    H14 (hardness)

    24S-1

    .02 (thickness)

    Daryl
    2024 t3 is what you need . thats the closest to what was used during and just after ww2 not sure when they changed the numbers

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    108
    3003-H14 is what was used for the leading and trailing edges. 2024-T3 for the spar and ribs.

    The old Aircraft Spruce catalogs used to have a chart.

  4. #4
    steveinindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,449
    Here's the chart Turtle referred to: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalo...s/aluminfo.php (Scroll down).

    As Turtle said, 3003 is the equivalent of 3S apparently. I learned something I didn't know previously as a result of the search that turned that up
    Unfortunately in science what you believe is irrelevant.

    "I'm an old-fashioned Southern Gentleman. Which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-***** when I want to be."- Robert A. Heinlein.



  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Minnetonka MN
    Posts
    142
    3003H14 is pretty soft stuff when compared to 2024T3 which feels more like a clockspring. Considering that the harder material drills and cuts better & is a lot stronger, you may want to just use 2024T3. It does cost a little more but those cauliflowered leading edges you see on Cubs are pretty much due to the use of 3003H14.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    108
    I'd use what Piper used. In most cases when someone made a part with a "better" grade, it didn't last as long as the original due to things like cracking.

    Mr. Piper was almost as smart as he was cheap.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    Actually, 2024T3 is pretty much approved by the FAA to replace the older grades of aluminum used in most aircraft, including Pipers. 7075 and some other less common grades excepted. Give AC43.13 a read. For a flap, 2024 is certainly the preferred material.

    I will agree that Mr. Piper was cheap.

    Best of luck,

    Wes
    N78PS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •