Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Advice and techniques for running at reduced power settings

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Green Goggles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    102

    Advice and techniques for running at reduced power settings

    I started flying about 4 years ago, and have logged all of my 200 hours in an M20C Mooney.
    I have the carburated, 180-horse Lycoming engine.


    For all of those 200 hours, I operated with engine RPM between 2300 and 2500- the recommended operating range according to my owner's manual. (Generally I was going somewhere and wanted to get there.) 2000-2250 is the Red Arc, denoting no continuous operations.


    Recently, it seems I am never in a hurry, just sight seeing. And I want to burn less fuel. So what do I need to know to safely operate below that range?
    Is there anything to be aware of regarding mixture settings, carb heat, or the reduced cylinder temperatures?


    My owners manual gives powers settings for 1800 RPM, noting 16.9, 16.8, and 16.6 inches at 5,000 ft, 7500 ft, and 10,000 ft respectively, but that's it.
    Do I need to reduce power to 16 inches to safely buzz around at 1800 RPM? Am I over thinking this?


    Any thoughts or advice are appreciated!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    For what you are doing, there is no advantage to running at low RPM. I believe that you are looking for low fuel consumption and you can get that at more typical RPMs.

    Lycoming will be happy to sell you an operating manual for the O-360 engine that contains a TON more operating info than you will find in the Mooney airframe manual. I highly recommend that you get it.

    I will suggest that you can happily run around at 2300 RPM with the manifold pressure set for 55% power with the mixture pulled way out to get low fuel burn at moderate speed. You could run 18" - 20" MP with lots of leaning if you want.

    So the next question is whether your airplane has an Insight or JPI or EI engine analyzer. With the temps for every cylinder you can really tell what the mixture control is doing for you and you can get your lowest fuel consumption.

    At low RPM, the airplane won't accelerate if you discover that you need to maneuver and you can hurt the engine by applying too much manifold pressure. Low RPM, low MP, cruise is usually done by the ferry guys trying to get the absolute max miles per gallon so that they can cross an ocean.

    Hope this info helps,

    Wes
    N78PS

  3. #3
    Green Goggles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    102
    That all makes sense and is very helpful. Thanks! Name:  cheers2.gif
Views: 560
Size:  2.7 KB

    FWIW, I don't have any type of engine analyzer in my airplane. I have one overall cylinder temperature guage, not individual readings.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    I will suggest that a GEM or a JPI is a better investment than the latest sexy mode S transponder. With a light bar for every cylinder you can see exactly what is going on in your engine and lean very reliably. I own two Insight GEM 602's (two airplanes). If you foul a plug on startup and your engine runs rough when you do your mag check, you can see exactly which cylinder and which plug. Takes the sweat out of trouble shooting. Lets you get the best fuel consumption at any power setting.

    Best of luck,

    Wes
    N78PS

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,575
    I owned a 1970 M20C.

    The prohibition of between 2000 and 2250 is probably due to some harmful vibration either prop or engine or the combination of both.

    As for as hurting the engine with too low of rpm if you need to add power, that is a partial truth. If you have to add any significant amount of power, like a go around, THE PROPER PROCEDURE IS FIRST PUSH UP THE PROP RPM TO FULL AND PROBABLY THE MIXTURE TO FULL IF AT LOW ALTITUDE AND ONLY THEN ADD THE THROTTLE.
    So going to more power lead with the rpm and mixture, then add throttle.
    The reverse is true when needing less power, bring throttle back as needed, then prop rpm, then set mixture leaner as needed for less power.
    It only takes a few seconds to lead with prop and mixture when adding power and even on a go around you can come in with a smooth addition of power and not need to slam the throttle open.
    It is one reason I like the Mooney style pedestal with the three levers better than the Cessna style push pull knobs; it is easier to make changes with one hand for all three levers.

    It might be nice to have an engine analyzer, but I think the 4 cylinder carbureted engine is a simple and reliable one as it is.
    My injected Lyc IO 360 in my next Mooney 201 went to 2000 hr tbo, used a lot of oil but kept running.

    By the way if anyone tells you those Mooneys are hard to land is almost surely not much of a Mooney pilot and probably trying to land too fast and/or with power on.
    Last edited by Bill Greenwood; 10-10-2012 at 08:35 PM.

  6. #6
    Green Goggles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    102
    Many good thoughts there, Bill.
    Thank you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Greenwood View Post
    By the way if anyone tells you those Mooneys are hard to land is almost surely not much of a Mooney pilot and probably trying to land too fast and/or with power on.
    I did all my flight training in my Mooney, and it is the only plane I've ever flown.
    So... even if they are difficult to land, I wouldn't know any better!

  7. #7
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by WLIU View Post
    I will suggest that a GEM or a JPI is a better investment than the latest sexy mode S transponder. With a light bar for every cylinder you can see exactly what is going on in your engine and lean very reliably. I own two Insight GEM 602's (two airplanes). If you foul a plug on startup and your engine runs rough when you do your mag check, you can see exactly which cylinder and which plug. Takes the sweat out of trouble shooting. Lets you get the best fuel consumption at any power setting.
    I could see this talk of an engine monitor if he had a fuel injected engine, which could likely be ran lean of peak fairly easily. However, I'm not sure that an engine monitor is really a worth while investment on a carburated engine, where running LOP is going to be a challenge no matter what you do.
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    The reason for the red arc on the tach is indeed due to destructive resonance between the 4 cylinder engine and the prop. Hartzell does a bunch of testing and in that RPM range the blades apparently are fatiguing at a rate that greatly shortens their fatigue life. It apparently has to do with resonance between the prop and crank, etc.

    An engine monitor is just as valuable with a carbureted engine, but if you do not need to worry about that last gallon-per-hour, or when the engine burps you just drop your ship off at the shop and wait for the bill, you don't need one. I can report that as soon as I installed my first one, fired up, and started seeing what it told me, I had an "A-HAH!" moment and never looked back. But I fly airplanes with limited fuel supply and when going cross country always have to optimize my fuel burn. If you fly an airplane where low fuel means that you still have 2 hours on board, then you don't need precise info on your engine performance.

    Fly safe,

    Wes
    N78PS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •