Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Prop clearance on a Challenger II

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Seffner, Florida
    Posts
    8

    Prop clearance on a Challenger II

    I just received and installed new Warp Drive prop blades on my Challenger II. The new blades are 2 1/8" longer than the original ones and only clear the tail upper support tube by 3/4". I am not sure if the originals were cut or not as I bought this plane used. I have pulled and tugged on the engine to try to get the tips to contact the airframe in any way and can not. I have run the engine at full throttle and all seems oK.
    My question is, " is there a set or suggested minimum clearance for this configuration? " I can cut the blades but would rather not after spending $600.00 for them.
    I am running a 70 HP 3 cylinder engine with 3 blade hub

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Fayetteville nc
    Posts
    31
    cut em,, if ya cut em cut in circle, dont cut square! Cutting a inch want hurt. I have 3 blade warp pusher and tractor prop for sell 910-257-7322.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    For what its worth, the clearance required is a function of how much your engine moves on its mounts. You would be surprised at the amount of motion allowed by the rubber shock mounts. For example, on startup, during the first few cylinder firings, most engines move around. And since the prop functions as a gyroscope at normal operating rpm, when you pitch up or pitch down, the prop yaws left and right (look up the "right hand screw rule") as the force is translated through that gyroscope.

    So I will offer the guess that you want more than 3/4" clearance.

    Most propeller manufacturers like Hartzell spec a minimum and maximum blade length. The maker of your prop can offer advice as to how much trimming is OK and the best method for your winding up with a properly balanced prop. They will likely even do it for you for a fee. And you do NOT want to fly with an out of balance prop. You will need even more clearance to the tubes if you attempt that. And a parachute....

    Best of luck,

    Wes
    N78PS

  4. #4
    Paul Chaplin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Yerington, NV
    Posts
    3
    The FAR's require a minimum distance between prop and aircraft. Look it up. Don't cut the tips from your prop. That is considered a major alteration and, if the manufacturer approves it, must be done by an FAA approved facility (FAR 43). Not even an A&P can legally do this job.

  5. #5
    kscessnadriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Chaplin View Post
    The FAR's require a minimum distance between prop and aircraft. Look it up. Don't cut the tips from your prop. That is considered a major alteration and, if the manufacturer approves it, must be done by an FAA approved facility (FAR 43). Not even an A&P can legally do this job.
    Challenger II is not a type certificated aircraft and as such, most, if not all, of what you posted doesn't apply.
    KSCessnaDriver
    ATP MEL, Commercial Lighter Than Air-Airship, SEL, CFI/CFII
    Private SES

  6. #6
    Paul Chaplin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Yerington, NV
    Posts
    3
    One of the biggest reasons home builders get into trouble is that they ignore conventional wisdom and invent their own rules and processes. Granted the Challenger II is not type certificated but that is not an excuse to commit acts that endanger the operator and/or passengers. The point of my posting was to inform and educate.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •