Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Flying a Chief

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The A-65 with the Stromberg carb had some problems with the engine quiting on final. Once I put a Marvel carb on and tossed the Strombrg, it never happened again. A little less drastic is to send your Stromberg in to Don Swords and have him overhaul it.If the carb is a Stromberg and it is many years old, it should be overhauled anyway. There were several different carb fuel float parts which were blessed and then unblessed. The pointed part which shut off the fuel when the bowl was full went from something I don't remember, to stainless steel, to delrin. Give Don a call and let him make you smart before you spend any money.Google Don's Dream Machines...Sorry about the formatting. This site is not IPAD friendly.Pete

  2. #2
    One other thing you might consider - a wood propeller on a 65HP Chief doesn't have the mass of a metal propeller. If the carb does ice up and the engine quits, and you are in the pattern flying slow, the propeller may not windmill making restart impossible. As stated above, liberal use of carburetor heat at or below 2000 RPM usually takes care of carb ice. Good luck.
    -Joel Marketello

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    107

    Flying a Chief

    mjr,

    I don't want to sway you against the sage counsel of all of the nightmares you have been warned, but as an owner of a beautiful Chief for about two months now, I can advise you to not lie awake nights with horror stories beating on your common sense. Carb Ice is a very real thing but is not an exclusive property of the A-65 Continental and engine failures on final are also not the kind of bug-a-boo you should sweat in your aircraft selection. I don't know what kind of aircraft you have flown before but certainly finding one close to you and working out a ride with a competent pilot or ,better yet a tailwheel instructor, will give you a much better idea of what you are considering than any other approach. This type of aircraft has been successfully flown for more than a 1/2 century and they haven't all crashed and burned! My proof of this is that there are still some nice looking ones on Barnstormers and Trade-a-Plane or even the NAA site. Check out your flying mission and see if it matches up with a Chief. If so, take that trial ride. Soon enough, you may become one of those folks looking for more and more detailed info on its' parts and pieces.
    Good Luck.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Circle Pines MN
    Posts
    245
    OK, lets take a close look at some of these comments about small Continentals and Aeroncas.

    I don't think the small Continentals are unreliable by any means. They are as reliable or unreliable as the quality of parts and regular maintenance they receive, meaning, if they get good maintenance they should be a very reliable engine. Of course you have to remember that these engines and airframes are around 60 some years old too.

    About carb ice, given the right conditions, like cool damp days, the little Continentals love to make ice. Is that a problem, not if your aware of it and deal with it. If your in cruise flight and given the conditions, you think there might be a chance for carb ice, you use carb heat for about 30 seconds to make sure there is none, then you turn it off, is that a big deal, not really. When flying behind these engines you should be aware of your surroundings and conditions and fly appropriately, that's being an good pilot.
    It's the same thing when you pull the power back for a long time in the air, you have to "clear the engine" on occasion so you maintain some heat in the engine for carb heat. You don't just pull the power all the way back and leave it there.

    Another thing, you should be flying your patterns close enough (in any plane) that if you lose an engine you can still make the runway. In something as slow as a Chief or Champ you don't fly big jet plane type of patterns. If you have to fly a long extended downwind, then stay at near cruise power and pattern altitude and then reduce power when you get closer to the runway. These planes will slow down and come down out of the sky very easily in the pattern, it's what they do best.

    These are reliable engines and great planes to fly. Remember also that they have no electrical systems, no starter, lights or radio, except a handheld. Those may be factors in your decision to buy one. If your still interested, check out the Aeronca web site, http://www.aeroncapilots.com/ in the forum section. There are very few AD's on the airframe and engine, which most have been taken care of years ago. Get someone who's knowledgeable about Aeroncas to look at the plane your interested in before you pay any money, it could save you lots of time and money in the long run.

    Aeronca Chiefs and Champs are fun to fly and relatively affordable.
    I've owned my Champ for about 28 years now and I love it, currently it's under restoration.
    Jim

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3
    Thank you everyone for all the great insight - I appreciate it!It's funny: years ago I restored a 1934 Sanford fire engine. It was powered by a 6 cylinder Continental engine with a Stromberg carb. I had more problems than I could remember with the float sticking on it. These stories are all too familiar!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    64
    hey may have Continental confused with Lycoming. my advice to anyone considering a Lycoming powered Chief is to run away.

  7. #7
    Richard Warner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Covington, LA
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by tonycondon View Post
    hey may have Continental confused with Lycoming. my advice to anyone considering a Lycoming powered Chief is to run away.
    I agree. The Lycoming is 65 h.p. in name only......probably actually about 55 h.p. By the way, whoever told you that the Continental A65 is unreliable doesn't know what he's talking about. They will even run good when very sick. I have flown Cubs, Champs, Chiefs, T-Crafts off and on for 59 years. I never had one quit. I have had carb ice, but you just watch for it when the conditions are right for the formation. I think the 0-200 is the worse for carb ice. The Stromberg carb is really nothing but an old tractor carb. Their have been, to my knowledge, no AD's ever issued on it. When the delrin needle is installed, a weight has to be soldered on the float to make it seat because it is so light. The steel needle tended to leak. The rubber tipped one worked real well until they started putting junk in the gasoline. Some of the additives in auto fyel(not just alcohol) would make that rubber tip swell up like a pregnant cow and shut the gas off. The Chiefs and Champs are both good little planes.

  8. #8

    Hello MJR

    I fly a Chief with an A75. Although I have never had a dead engine while flying, I suspect I will have to be near Vne to get it to windmill. The compression is pretty good.
    I haven't had any carb ice issues by simply using the common carb heat practice as I would with any other plane. My experience has always been SEL and mostly smaller aircraft (Cherokee 140, Cessna 150, Skipper, ETC) so the carb heat application is near the same.
    Jim said,"Another thing, you should be flying your patterns close enough (in any plane) that if you lose an engine you can still make the runway. In something as slow as a Chief or Champ you don't fly big jet plane type of patterns. If you have to fly a long extended downwind, then stay at near cruise power and pattern altitude and then reduce power when you get closer to the runway. These planes will slow down and come down out of the sky very easily in the pattern, it's what they do best", which is very good advice. When I wish to attempt to impress someone with a really smooth landing, I hold around 1500 RPMs until the tires begin to roll.
    Remember, a little power during landing still keeps landing distance shorter than your take-off distance. You can always get the Chief into places you can't get out of with the A65.

    Good Flying!

  9. #9
    I've owned 3286E since 1989, flying it since 1995. Nothing too serious, a few things with fuel caps not venting, a carb that likes to flood. . . but absolutely nothing wrong with either the engine or the airframe. It's an easy plane to land and get confidence in, after the first 15 hours in it or so.

    Aeroncas are easy to work on, easy to restore, still have parts being made for them.

    Check out the NAA website, join the email list at aeronca@westmont.edu and you'll find more about them.

    Go for it, you will not be disappointed.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maCVg...KNSv3c4gZZp2Qw

    Here are some videos of it flying, one in HD even...with a $37 cam on the wingtip!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7FQQ...=ULB7FQQtAIB4E
    Last edited by Mark Peterson; 09-08-2012 at 03:09 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •