Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: New Math?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    37

    Question New Math?

    I went through my archive at home from my time on staff... I can't find documentation about when EAA changed the way they "count" admissions. Perhaps an on-staff historian remembers? I can think of two that certainly should. My neighbor, a lifetime member, seems to think it was 2003, 2004, or 2005. But, regardless of *when*, if you change the way you "count" then is that not automatically some "creative accounting"?

    If I'm teaching my daughter to count, am I allowed to tell her sometimes a dozen is 12, and sometimes it is 21.3?

    My concern is for the Oshkosh residents and our neighbors in surrounding townships/counties/etc. I strongly believe EAA overstates their economic impact on the area. I don't doubt that "convention" I mean, AirVenture, of course, brings in money, but I know the numbers are overstated.

    I'd like to see sources. Maybe some EAA reports, or tax filings. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly buy y'all a beer and apologize.

  2. #2
    Jim Heffelfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California, United States
    Posts
    416

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    31
    It was shared with me that the 'local' economic impact was $113 Million a year. I have the documentation from the EAA that backs this up.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Heffelfinger View Post
    Here is one published report
    Ooh, good stuff. Thank you for the share. I'd never seen this before.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Unwiredone View Post
    have the documentation from the EAA that backs this up.
    I have good reason to doubt any "documentation" from EAA.

  6. #6
    Anymouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    2A2
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattmutz2 View Post
    I have good reason to doubt any "documentation" from EAA.
    Are you related to Jim Campbell??
    Someday I'll come up with something profound to put here.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Anymouse View Post
    Are you related to Jim Campbell??
    I am not. But here is a great quote from him

    Time is not on our side. At most, we have 5 years and maybe fewer before the only GA left is business aviation and the very wealthy.

    Source:
    http://aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&ID=79F9AB5B-1E75-47BC-954F-A7925D2A8DE7

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    28
    Matt,

    According to published sources, EAA changed their counting method in 2006. From the 1980's until 2005 they used to report attendances in the 700,000 and 800,000 range. There was a lot of skepticism about the validity of these numbers. In 2006 the number was published as 545,000 and EAA said they were correcting past counting errors.

    Since then the attendance has been published as:

    2006 - 545,000
    2007 - 560,000
    2008 - 540,000
    2009 - 578,000
    2010 - 535,000
    2011 - 541,000
    2012 - 508,000

    Which does show what many could observe with their eyes - attendance this year was way down.

    Can't blame the economy or the weather. My theory is that it was a combination of aggressive price increases, along with the departure of most of the marketing department.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    Wow, they might have a challenge on their hands to break 500,000 next yr. There is easily 8000 PO'd members.

    Will probably have to relocate the event closer to the population center of the US to facilitate attendance. Population center of the contiguous US is in Missouri.

    Obviously the attendance number have little relevance because the organizers are going to call the event a roaring success regardless of attendance.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Burtles View Post
    Matt,

    According to published sources, EAA changed their counting method in 2006. From the 1980's until 2005 they used to report attendances in the 700,000 and 800,000 range. There was a lot of skepticism about the validity of these numbers. In 2006 the number was published as 545,000 and EAA said they were correcting past counting errors.

    Since then the attendance has been published as:

    2006 - 545,000
    2007 - 560,000
    2008 - 540,000
    2009 - 578,000
    2010 - 535,000
    2011 - 541,000
    2012 - 508,000

    Which does show what many could observe with their eyes - attendance this year was way down.

    Can't blame the economy or the weather. My theory is that it was a combination of aggressive price increases, along with the departure of most of the marketing department.
    Amazing how all the numbers are all even thousands. A statistical anomaly? If the math is so accurate in what they use, give us the REAL number of wristbands sold and exactly how many people attended the event.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •