Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Beacon vs strobe anticollision question

  1. #11
    steveinindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,449
    Actually, Steve, the BRS useage historically has been at low altitude (500-1000' AGL) to save a pilot during the infamous turn-to-final spin.
    If you look at the use in Cirrus though, that's not the case. It is in the ultralight community but among the larger aircraft the numbers seem to be different probably because under nearly perfect conditions it takes nearly a thousand feet to get the CAPS deployed.

    http://www.cirruspilots.org/Content/CAPSHistory.aspx

    There was the case here in Indy (deployed at 528 feet and according to some it did not fully deploy) and the one in Deltona, Florida (both occupants killed; chute deployed immediately prior to impact after spin/stall). The CAPS is not a reliable "out" for a spin/stall scenario at low altitude (<1000') in a standard GA aircraft based on the data currently available. That said, it's a g-dsend in cases where you need it at a higher altitude. There is a reason why I am putting such a system on my designs (although with a compressed gas propulsion system rather than a solid fuel rocket).
    Last edited by steveinindy; 03-05-2012 at 01:52 AM.
    Unfortunately in science what you believe is irrelevant.

    "I'm an old-fashioned Southern Gentleman. Which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-***** when I want to be."- Robert A. Heinlein.



  2. #12

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    I will suggest that no system can help you if you do not employ it in time. I think that the previous posts have veered away from solid ground into some speculation based on incomplete anecdotes.

    If I may offer some info provided in another thread by a member of the board of directos of BRS, maker of the parachute emergency systems, Tom Adams reports as follows.

    "My back ground on the sublect comes from 19 years of being on the Board of directors of BRS, Inc of South St Paul, Minnesota.

    Here are some recorded statistics about the use of this type of unit:

    1.) The FAA has issued Suplimental Type certificates for these units on, C-150 / 152, C-172, C-182,
    Cessna "Skycatcher", Piper "Sport"( Both of which can be ordered as options) .

    2.) The Cirus has had the BRS produced recovery system installad as standard equipment starting at the first production aircraft.

    3,) The various units produced by BRS Inc. have been installed on many of the Kit A/C, LSA as well as ultri-lights as well as the Standard category aircraft previously mentioned.

    4.) To date BRS inc.( the A/C recovery Parachute) has been responsable for saveing 268 ( as in two hundred sixty eight) lives by thier use.

    5.) Some additional facts are: sucessfull deployments in in Supplimental certificated, experimental and ultra light A/C are ..26 from surface to 100', 53 from 101' to 500' 14 between 501 and 1000' the rest above 3000'. Sucessful deployments in Cirus A/C are, 4 from 101' to 500', 11 from 501' to 1000', and 13 above 3000'

    6,) The rest of the saves were in the Ultra-Light family of aircraft which as we know do not often get very high"


    I think that item 5 addresses the factual data for the Cirrus.

    Now back to the discussion about strobes and beacons.

    Fly safe,

    Wes
    N78PS

  3. #13
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,627
    The airline pilots use a red beacon before engine start and strobes on the runway, but for GA we believe all you need is strobes and the beacon is optional. We did agree it's poor form to taxi around at night on the ramp with the strobes on blinding everyone, but the debate is about what's legal minimum equipment on the aircraft.
    Rotating beacons and strobes are both approved anticollisison lights. You'll find some planes with stobing red lights on the tail rather than beacons as well. The certification requirements for anticollision lights changed several times over years and older planes are grandfathered under their original certification. My plane isn't required to have them at all and didn't come with them. I've got integrated position and strobes embedded in my tip tanks.
    Frankly, I believe strobes to be superior. Most rotating beacons are too feeble to be really useful. I was considering putting a whalen red strobe in my tail as there's no visibility of the tip tank mounted strboes from the rear.

    The premise by the way is wrong. There are airlines without rotating beacons at all. Anticollision lights are not necessary for taxiing, and there are explicit exemptions to turn them off when they would be problematic. In fact, such lights have been pretty much shown to be not very useful on the ground anyhow. Even airliners with all their lights (including anti collision, position, and the various logo lights) have been shown to be pretty hard to spot at night on the ground.

    I burn the strobes all the time except ground ops in darkness. They come on with the transponder as I cross the hold short line at night.

    If people want to argue Cirrus accident rates and/or BRS efficacy, I suggest they find another thread rather than drifting this one all over the place.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Clarklake, MI
    Posts
    2,461
    "Rotating beacon" is a misnomer as not all beacons rotate. For example, the beacon used on 1000's of Cessna's is just a bulb that turns on/off, no mechanical rotation involved. Also, not all beacons are part of an anticollision light system. I fly a plane that has a red beacon on top and bottom of the fuselage, they are actually strobe lights but the switch is labeled beacon light, and the airplane flight manual specifically says the beacon lights are not to be used as anticollision lights. Same is true in the MEL, beacon and anticollision are separate systems.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,575
    To "Flying Ron" , this topic was about gen av beacon vs strobe, and not about airlines.
    If you want to write about airlines, why don't you do "find another thread rather than drifting this one all over the place."

    Does that sound pretty rude as I write it?

    It did when you thought it was your place to tell other people what to write or not on this EAA forum.
    Last edited by Bill Greenwood; 03-05-2012 at 08:54 PM.

  6. #16
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,627
    It wasn't my intention to be rude, and rudeness in response to rudeness isn't reasonable behavior in any event. But just as those who hijacked the thread had their opinions about Cirrus aircraft and pilot, I am entitled to mine.

    It was purely a suggestion that people had hijacked a thread to dredge up some vendetta about Cirrus or Cirrus pilots.
    My comments on the airlines were specifically addressing the comment on the airlines in Osprey's initial post where he solicited opinions on his statements.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    FA40
    Posts
    767
    Quote Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
    the debate is about what's legal minimum equipment on the aircraft.
    night flight. the AIM says in 4-3-23 that aircraft equipped with an anti-collision light system are required to operate that system during all types of operations. not all aircraft are required to have anti-collision lights for day ops. CFR14 pt 91.205 requires approved anti-collision lights for ALL U.S.-registered civil aircraft operated at night. all, not just for-hire. does not mention beacons. some beacons may fit the legal definition of anti-collision lights, depending on when they were installed and when the aircraft was certificated. approved strobes fit the definition for all the included dates. 91.209 says the anti-collision lights need not be lighted when the pilot-in-command determines that, because of operating conditions, it would be in the interest of safety to turn the lights off.

    so. yes, you're right, the minimum is an approved anti-collision light system in operation on all N# aircraft (all, including pt 91, 135, 121, etc) unless the PIC determines it's safer to turn it off. which may be the case on a crowded ramp during taxi. or not.

  8. #18
    FlyingRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NC26 (Catawba, NC)
    Posts
    2,627
    Eh? There's no requirement for older planes to have an anticollision light, so I don't know what "minimum" you are setting.
    You need position lights for night in all planes.

    If you have anticollision lights you are expected to use them (DAY OR NIGHT) except as stated when the interest of safety mandates otherwise.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,575
    Ron, I will try to be as polite as possible, but using your own words. You write that you are entitled to your opinion, whether it is about airlines or Cirrus . I agree.
    However, you also write that others ought not to use these topics on this forum.
    And you don't even consider that's rude. I think this is an public forum, open to all and to all opinions, and should not be subject to you or any other self appointed censor. I am a bit old fashioned about freedom of speech. And it is not reserved for your exclusive use or approval.
    I think that when you try to restrict someone else's speech or writing, you should realize that it is rude.This forum is not a tea party meeting.

    I have noticed both Cirrus and Diamonds starting and taxiing with strobes on and not red beacons, so I wrote that. Someone wrote that Cirrus had a "miserable" safety rating. I had just read the AVIATION CONSUMER report, that analyzes actual accident and fatal statistics, not just someones opinion or propaganda, and puts the Cirrus rate as pretty much average, not the best nor the worst. I am not selling any Cirrus or any system, but there are a lot of Cirrus flyiing and they have a lot of safety claims, and I think the results are of interest or should be to many people on this forum, which is about gen av (EAA) more so than airline lights at night.

    You have the right to agree or disagree and post raw opinion or backed up by facts, and so does anyone else.

    If you want a forum where only the opinions which the owner of the private website agrees with are allowed, I can refer you to it.
    Last edited by Bill Greenwood; 03-06-2012 at 10:49 AM.

  10. #20
    Jim Hann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ballwin, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    425
    Ron, I think he is just paraphrasing this. Look at an old DC-8 or 727-100 they do not have, nor are required to, a WHITE (i.e. strobe) anticollision light system. Even though many of them have been converted to strobe systems under their red lenses, because those old Grimes type oscillating beacons are ridiculously expensive to repair

    As far as usage goes, I'm not touching that one, I usually use the ICAO standard for my beacon, and strobes go on when cleared for takeoff at night in good weather. Everybody has their own idea of what is best. YMMV

    Jim
    ATP/MEL, COM/SEL
    B747-4, B757, B767, BA-4100, EMB-145, LR-JET
    CFI-A/I/ME

    14CFR91.205(c)(3) An approved aviation red or aviation white anticollision light system on all U.S.-registered civil aircraft. Anticollision light systems initially installed after August 11, 1971, on aircraft for which a type certificate was issued or applied for before August 11, 1971, must at least meet the anticollision light standards of part 23, 25, 27, or 29 of this chapter, as applicable, that were in effect on August 10, 1971, except that the color may be either aviation red or aviation white. In the event of failure of any light of the anticollision light system, operations with the aircraft may be continued to a stop where repairs or replacement can be made.
    Jim Hann
    EAA 276294 Lifetime
    Vintage 722607
    1957 Piper PA-22/20 "Super Pacer"
    Chapter 32 member www.eaa32.org
    www.mykitlog.com/LinerDrivr
    Fly Baby/Hevle Classic Tandem


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •