Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Tail wheel springs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Jim Heffelfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California, United States
    Posts
    416

    Tail wheel springs

    This was asked in the old forum with lots of non specific answers. I will ask it again.
    Are tail wheel springs necessary? Could I go with cables directly to the wheel steering connects?
    Conditions: tiny single seat former UL, tail weight less than 40#, gross of 500#. Matco 6" pneumatic.

  2. #2
    Eric Witherspoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    200
    My Sonex has a rigid link between the tailwheel and the rudder. It's a push-pull link, so I'd say you don't even need a dual pull-pull setup, much less any spring. Gross weight is 1150 lbs, and it will generally have the tailwheel off the ground in the mid 40's mph, though I suppose it's probably rolled into the mid 50's mph no problems.

    Name:  snx_tailwheel.jpg
Views: 2334
Size:  23.6 KB
    Murphy's 13th: Every solution breeds new problems...

    http://www.spoonworld.com

  3. #3
    Dana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    933
    Depends on what kind of surface you fly off of (pavement, smooth grass, rough surfaces). No springs at all sounds like a bad idea on anything but pavement or very smooth grass.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    Springs between the rudder and the tail wheel allow you to deflect the rudder when the weight on the tail wheel and the forward motion of the aircraft resists your foot pressure. If you touch down with the rudder deflected to compensate for a cross wind (with one wing down), the tail wheel will attempt to snap from its deflected position to straight. With no spring in the load path, your foot is going to feel that "kick" a lot more. The spring softens what your foot feels.

    Hope this info helps.

    Wes
    N78PS


    P.S. I have flown a number of airplanes that have free castering, non steerable, tail wheels. Worked just fine. A little more braking sometimes, but easier to steer in tight places.
    Last edited by WLIU; 02-28-2012 at 06:37 PM.

  5. #5
    Jim Heffelfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California, United States
    Posts
    416
    Reason I am asking is weight. I have a light engine and most likely will have a heavy tail - That Matco is a sweet piece of hardware but 2 pounds heavier than stock shopping cart wheel. Every ounce saved is pounds not carried in the nose. Is there a lightening suggestion for the Matco? It's rated for 250# - way more than it will ever see. Thanks

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,342
    I know of at least one airplane that uses what looks like a roller blade wheel for a tail wheel. Other than looks, why is the Matco attractive?

    A lot depends on whether you will be flying from paved or unpaved surfaces. If you only fly from well maintained concrete or asphalt runways, you can use a smaller and lighter tail wheel than if you regularly land on gravel bars.

    Best of luck,

    Wes
    N78PS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •