EAA cuts

[mattmutz]

Am I the only one that thinks that a massive cut like this is a sign of bad leadership at EAA HQ? Perhaps not Rod's, but maybe Tom's? Obviously somebody went wrong somewhere. I can't see a reason to make a big change like this now unless a big mistake was made in the past.

[martymayes]

Am I the only one that thinks that a massive cut like this is a sign of bad leadership at EAA HQ? Perhaps not Rod's, but maybe Tom's? Obviously somebody went wrong somewhere. I can't see a reason to make a big change like this now unless a big mistake was made in the past.

No, difference in philosphy is all it takes.

[Dan Grunloh]

I can't see a reason to make a big change like this now unless a big mistake was made in the past.

OR a series of small decisions that were correct at the time but now limit progress. There's no question the websites need a complete makeover and that digital technologies are changing very fast. Do they hire in new full time help for that work knowing it will change again in a few years or send the work out to experts that can keep up? Pat Panzera has posted elsewhere that the specialty newsletters may become downloadable PDF's with hyperlinks (and perhaps embedded audio and video) which would be a good thing. I don't understand the loss of the photo and video capabilities but would welcome AirVenture videos that had more airplanes in them instead of mostly celebrity interviews (crossing my fingers). I really liked Adam Smith and feel his departure is a big loss for EAA.

[Hangar10]

I really liked Adam Smith and feel his departure is a big loss for EAA.

Several in our neck of the woods share the same sentiment.

[Antique Tower]

Same here. Can't be a good thing.

[Jim Hann]

I really liked Adam Smith and feel his departure is a big loss for EAA.

I echo this sentiment. Adam spoke to Chapter 32 at our Christmas Banquet a few years back, Janet even flew him down! He is a wonderful gent and I wish him well in whatever he does next.

Jim

[Chad Jensen]

Chad... Update this, please?

The only update to that post would be that Steve did decide to leave EAA on his own on Friday morning. I didn't know he had left until he had already left the building, so I didn't have a chance to talk to him.

So... Would anyone like to comment on the fact that Rod was advocating for pay raise for himself and the VP's to help them feel better about make these hard decisions.

Source?

[Floatsflyer]

Am I the only one that thinks that a massive cut like this is a sign of bad leadership at EAA HQ? Perhaps not Rod's, but maybe Tom's? Obviously somebody went wrong somewhere. I can't see a reason to make a big change like this now unless a big mistake was made in the past.

This downsizing, rightsizing, mass layoffs-take your pick- is not about "bad leadership", it clearly is about new leadership. Although EAA and the Foundation are NFP's, they are operated and managed like any other $multi-million corporation so when Hightower agreed to come on board, one of two scenarios likely occurred:

1. Hightower accepted the position on the condition that he could take a year or so to review the Association and Foundation and make changes and deploy resources as he saw fit; or

2. As a condition of being offered the position, Hightower was told by TP that his mandate included making major operational/organizational changes which would include substantial staff downsizing wthin a year or so of starting. After 40+ years, TP did not want to be responsible for staff cuts and therefore look like and be the bad guy.

[wa6ilt]

Is it true that peope were pink slipped and had to immediately leave the building? That seems extreme to me for this kind of organization. It's not like EAA is a nuke plant or other high security operation. I've always thought this was a very shabby way of treating loyal employees.

[hydroguy2]

it appears the rumor mill has reached Critical Mass. Hopefully it can be shutdown before full meltdown