Thanks Tom, that sounds like something most of us could live with.
Type: Posts; User: DougJ
Thanks Tom, that sounds like something most of us could live with.
Hi Tom, Someone posted details on a forum (RCGoups) about a system similar to what you are describing called "Non-Equipped Networked Participant". Is that what EAA is going for?
Hi Tom, thanks for the clarification. I agree there are so many moving parts to all this it's hard to condense it down to a page.
Hi Tom, your answer to my post included, "We are confident that there is enough discretion built into the law that the FAA can, at minimum, relieve traditional model aviation from the RID...
Hi Tom, thanks for answering. Good to finally hear some optimism.
"May" means the Administrator can either grant the exemption or not. As Jim Moore from AOPA put it, "... while it does leave discretion about safety to the administrator, it does line up well with...
As a follow up, I had also reached out to AOPA's web editor, Jim Moore, after reading his AOPA article on the NPRM on remote ID, and asked about the exemption for modelers. He wrote back and said...
I joined the forum after reading the EAA's preliminary response to the FAA's NPRM on Remote ID, becuase I haven't hear anyone anywhere bring up the exemption for small unmanned aircraft (line of...