I think 91.319(e) is the one that applies.
Type: Posts; User: Greg Bockelman
I think 91.319(e) is the one that applies.
As you said, ANOMALIES. Just because a few drop dead or otherwise have issues out of the blue does not mean the physicals don't have value. They are useful to detect trends over time in an...
Hard to make a sound case with only one data point.
Short answer is "No".
I don't have specific answers, but I do have a question or two. What does the cancellation of the registration have to do with the airworthiness certificate? In the certified world, if I understand...
I don't know the specific details, but there is always more to the story than is first reported.
I don't see anyone "pushing" the PP. At least not in THIS thread. So far. What I see is a comparison or two, but that is all.
Well you are the one that started the thread with the premise that there is no interference from consumer electronics. If you truly don't use any of that stuff, why do you care?
You need...
Seems you are on a vendetta, Bill.
Having said that, I am sort of playing Devil's Advocate here.
But, I do think that there are enough unknowns that the risks can't just be ignored.
Isn't the fact that it might be possible worthy of some consideration?
The way it was explained to me is that electronic devices could be used if it was proven that they did not interfere with the avionics/systems of the aircraft. Since it was impossible to test every...
There is an outstanding one in Peoria, IL.
Works for me.
There are airline pilots with First Class medicals that are blind in one eye. So yes, you can get a medical and a pilot certificate being blind in one eye.
Of course, I can't vouch for diameter.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ANTIQUE-ALL-WOOD-FORD-MODEL-T-OTHERS-AUTOMOBILE-SPOKED-STEERING-WHEEL-?cmd=ViewItem&hash=item2c608161cc&item=190597652940&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0
University of Central Missouri.
http://www.ucmo.edu/aviation/
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/f11a5c945ba842338625747a006b2f74/$FILE/A-696.pdf
...
Because they hadn't thought of it. It would be pretty easy to add it.
It is what it is. It has been that way forever. No, they don't have radar. It would be useless with that many targets. They use the analog Mark I Eyeball, and so far it has worked very well. And...
I second that. Fore Flight is an awesome product and does way more than the Ifly can do.
An Eye Witness on another board said it was an F-4.
Got it. And it appears it is already taken care of. Thanks Mods.
There is a poster in the tapatalk thread that needs to be banned. User name epincescano is posting spam
I land in a crab on a regular basis.:D