Quote:
It seems that the EAA is often engaged in a (justified) battle with the bias reporting of GA accidents. For example, if statistics are unfavorably reported by [fill in the blank], an article in Sport Aviation tackles the statistics as bias. When a blog about the dangers of air racing vs. airshows is published, it is removed when our members believe aviation is being thrown under the bus.
I think the bias exists in the eyes of the reader of reports more often than whenever they read something with which they disagree with. It's much easier to scream "BIAS!" than to critically evaluate one's own activities. We do have some increased dangers and splitting hairs (excluding crashes from the test flight period for example; that's only valid if you split out the crashes of similar certificated aircraft in their first 40 hours of operations and compare them to the experimentals) like a lot of us do to make our numbers look better isn't valid statistical analysis on the face of an "apples to apples" standard. It goes back to that old Mark Twain quote about there being three kinds of liars: liars, d**n liars and statisticians.